Skip to content

Week 14 - Modeling and casting

Assignments

Group Assignment

  • Rreview the safety data sheets for each of your molding and casting materials,then make and compare test casts with each of them compare mold making processes

Individual Assignment

  • Design a mold around the process you'll be using,produce it with a smooth surface finish that does not show the production process toolpath,and use it to cast parts
  • Extra credit: use more then two mold parts

Group Working

My group work is attached here: https://fabacademy.org/2025/labs/unnc/assignments/week14/week14.html

Individual Working

This week, I experimented with two mold-making methods: one using silicone to create molds, and the other using CNC machining to produce steel molds.

Silicone mold production

Keychain Modeling

I first completed the 3D modeling of the keychain using Fusion 360. The design features a simple geometric outline, with a reserved hole for attaching a strap.

Fusion model


3D Printing

Once the design was finalized, I printed the keychain model using a 3D printer. The resulting object had a good surface finish and clearly defined details.

Print 1
Print 2


Testing 8015AB

I planned to use 8015AB (a silicone surface treatment agent) to improve surface adhesion before coating or printing.

8015AB

Mixing Test:
  • Mixed 8015A and 8015B in a 1:1 ratio.
  • Stirred evenly and observed the surface reaction and film-forming properties.

Mixing 1
Mixing 2
Curing

  • After the AB resin was fully cured and demolded, a large number of bubbles were present on the surface.

  • To improve the final finish and reduce air entrapment, I plan to use a vacuum pump for degassing in future tests.

Experiment Issues:

Due to the lack of a precise electronic scale, the mix ratio was inaccurate. As a result, the mixture failed to solidify or form a proper film — the surface remained sticky, indicating a significant deviation from the optimal AB ratio.

Failed result


Silicone mold making

To further process the keychain, I attempted to make a negative mold using silicone, for replication or casting.

Silicone mold


Reflection on failure

  • The curing agent was insufficient, resulting in prolonged uncured silicone.
  • Severe flow and bubble formation occurred.
  • Lessons Learned:
    • Always use a measuring cup or electronic scale to ensure accurate proportions.
    • Enhance defoaming steps during silicone preparation.

I experimented with a new process that combines 3D printing technology with hot press molding to fabricate a composite material of polycarbonate (PC) and high-temperature carbon fiber.

Metal mold

Material Introduction

Polycarbonate (PC) is a colorless, transparent thermoplastic engineering plastic known for its high impact strength, excellent heat resistance, and good molding processability. Its glass transition temperature is approximately 147°C, with a melting point between 220–230°C, making it suitable for secondary processing via hot press molding.

High-temperature-resistant carbon fiber (24K) is a high-strength carbon fiber bundle with outstanding mechanical properties and heat resistance, widely used in reinforced composite materials.

Experimental Steps:

  1. Mould processing

The processing results are as follows:

  1. PC Sheet Preparation
    First, FDM 3D printing technology was used to print two flat PC sheets.
  • Model slicing and uploading:


  • After printing, uniformly thick and smooth PC sheets were obtained:
  1. Material Preparation
    The required materials included molds, PC sheets, carbon fiber, and clamps:

  2. Hot Press Molding
    The carbon fiber was evenly arranged between the two PC sheets to form a "sandwich structure." The assembly was then placed into the mold and secured with clamps to ensure tight bonding during heating. A heat gun was used to heat the mold for 3–5 minutes, allowing the PC material to fully soften and fuse with the carbon fiber:

  1. Cooling and Demolding
    After heating for 3–5 minutes, molten material was observed overflowing from the mold surface, indicating that the PC had reached a softened state and begun to flow:
  • After cooling for a period, the mold was disassembled, revealing the fully formed material:
  • Comparison between finished product and PC material after processing:

It can be observed that the originally opaque material became transparent after processing, with significantly improved hardness and no internal bubbles.