After getting the files ready, it was time to fabricate. I explain the workflow below step by step.

1. Check material to see which side is bending
2. Place the material with the bending side up
3. Adjust the placement of material on the bed by aligning the existing straight line
4. Untie the milling head by using two renchs
5. Clean the head parts by air compressor
6. Change the end mill (this time I changed to Down cut end mill)
7. Set X and Y origin by moving the head from the PC and remote controller
8. Set Z origin by slowly bringing down the end mill to the surface of the material (manually spinning the end mill helps detect when it touches the surface)
9. Run the drill hole file to locate the placement for screws
10. Put screws to the holes to secure the material to the bed
11. Re-do the Z origin in the same way
12. Run the main milling file.
13. During the milling, It is possible to pause. When continuing after the pause, it is good to go back a few steps and spin the drill in advance.
14. Stay by the side of the machine and not in front
15. Wear safety glasses and headphones. Also, wear a mask if it is dusty.
16. When the milling job is done, use chisel and hammer to break bridges
17. Take out milled pieces
18. unscrew the material
19. Clean all the dust with vacuum cleaner

As a result, Living hinges were very different. The difference in thickness of the connecting parts was shown in the result of how much it bends. A living hinge with a 6mm connection was the closest to what I wanted to achieve. However the bending effect will also depend on the length of the piece, so it is also nice to test it with different lengths for a future investigation.

Double curvature was milled very nicely and I liked the look of them. The bending effect was not as strong as the laser cut version, since there is a limitation for how much the pattern can get complex. Although both of them were still bendable. I liked the 6mm version because it was more bendy than the 9mm version. This also depends on the size of the piece. I would like to test the bigger piece as a future investigation.

Snap joint was not very successful since it broke when I tried to join them for the first time. From this test, I learned the dimension for the snap joint needs to be more subtle because as material properties, 15mm Plywood is not very flexible. Also, the direction of the grain might have an effect on the direction of bending.

Taking the result of the first test, I started to design my chair. As I continued to design the assembly of the chair I started to realise that I needed to test a few more parts that were not sure. So I did another test.

For the second test, I milled 2 versions of scoring (depth of 9.3mm, and 12.4mm), an inverted living hinge pattern, and 3 types of joints. I used the same Gcode setting as the first test and used the milling machine in the same order as I explained above.

Test 2 Result

The 2 versions of Scoring was milled nicely. The 12.4mm depth version broke easily when I tried to bend it for the first time. However, it had good flexibility. This can be improved by considering the direction of the grain and also by using higher-quality plywood that has more laminated layers. On the other hand, the 9.3mm depth version was still very stiff, and it only bent a little bit.

The inverted living hinge pattern came out almost as I imagined, but the tip of the sticky part was damaged while the machine was operating pocketing. This can be improved by adjusting the gaps in between. The flexibility was not as much as I thought however this also depends on the size of the piece. I am guessing if the sticky parts are longer, they will bend more. This is also good for future investigation.

Joints were a complete failure. When milling, there were too few gaps between each piece that they moved during the milling process. This problem is very important to solve because the piece could have popped out from the mining area and damaged its surroundings. Next time I should have more gaps between pieces, especially for smaller pieces. The joinery was also unsuccessful because the tolerance was too tight for a piece to join. It needed to be 1mm or 0.5mm bigger to just fit through. So I will make 2mm or 1mm bigger for the next one just to be safe.

I apologise to my tutor Santi for not giving him the satisfaction of breaking my precious pieces.

After 2 tests I designed a chair with combined different sorts of bending functions. However, when I set the same milling setting as the previous time in Rhino CAM, it calculated 2.5 hours of milling. So I reached out to my tutor to get help. My tutor changed a lot of parameters, mainly the ones that have to be the speed of milling, especially for Engraving and Pocketing which take longer time to mill.

In the end, my tutor managed to reduce the milling time to 1.5 hours. It was the fastest setting for this model. The screenshot shows the detailed parameters for this fast milling setting.

Chair Result

Milling was done without any issues. I sanded roughly and checked how all the pieces fit together. However, As I was assembling I started to realise a few problems. The problems are below.

• Joints were too loose. This was because I made the tolerance a little bit too big. I think it should be around 0.5mm
• Lower front living hinge broke. It was trying to bend too much
• The Sitting surface broke when I tried to sit on it because it was too flexible.
• Lower back living hinge was bending well but did not much the joint.
• Middle back inverted living hinge was ok but scoring broke. It should have been no scoring or at least 9.3mm scoring.

The only part that went well was the top back living hinge which I used test 1 result to make the curve bigger. In the end, there was no chance for me to use the CNC milling machine again this week because there were many people already book the machine. I will leave this chair for now, but I would love to make the fixed version in the future. From making this chair I learned that I need to understand how the object will bend with the limitation of its material properties, and also consider the relation between movement and size because the living hinge becomes more flexible when the piece is bigger.