Week 3 — Computer-controlled cutting
This week’s topic: Computer-controlled cutting.
Individual assignment
Your personal work for this week — notes, photos, design files, and reflections.
Group assignment
Guangzhou (Chaihuo) — group documentation: laser-cutter characterization, joint tolerance tests, and GitLab-based collaboration.
Abstract
After completing the lab’s laser safety training, the group documents how the local laser cutter behaves in practice: focus setting versus cut quality, usable power levels, speed for cut versus mark, pulse frequency or effective scan rate (as applicable to the machine), measured kerf, joint clearance for press-fit or slot joints, and material types the site approves. The report adds a laser tolerance study—for example a comb test or equivalent spacing sweep—to find reliable gaps for finger joints and inlays. Photos and short video of representative cuts and tests are committed through the lab GitLab workflow (fork → branch → merge request), and the Chaihuo group site shows how that review and versioning ties to the physical lab work.
1. Safety training and approved use
Summarize the training completed, who signed off, and any lab-specific rules (ventilation, materials ban list, fire watch, supervision).
2. Machine characterization
Record focus, power, speed, frequency/rate, kerf, joint clearance, and materials in a table; note how each was measured (calipers, test coupons, microscope photos, etc.).
| Parameter | Notes / method |
|---|---|
| Focus | Relate focus setting to edge quality; record nominal vs. best visual cut. |
| Power / speed / rate | Ranges used for cut vs. mark; align with control UI labels for your machine. |
| Kerf | Measured from test cuts or comb coupons (calipers / photo overlay). |
| Joint clearance | Press-fit or slot joints: gap that fits reliably on this cutter. |
| Approved materials | List materials allowed at Chaihuo for laser processing. |
Lab photos (cutting workflow)
3. Tolerance testing (e.g. comb test)
Describe the test file, parameter sweep, and how the group chose “good” slots/fingers; use the photos below to annotate kerf, joint clearance, or comb coupons.
4. Collaboration: GitLab and the Chaihuo site
Briefly document fork, merge request, review, and where the narrative or embeds appear on the group documentation site.