Assignments

  • Review the safety data sheets for each of your molding and casting materials.
  • Make and compare test casts with each of them.
  • Compare printing vs milling molds.

Individual apport

  • Ernesto: My contribution to the group project included testing different materials such as a composite made from plaster and cement, and experimenting with chocolate casting. Additionally, I used food-safe silicone RTV for molding.
  • Jorge: I analyzed RTV PLATINUM 1510 Silicone Rubber, Mold Release Wax, Polyurethane Rubber, as well as castings such as Glycerin Soap with Chlorhexidine, Chocolate, and Ceramic Plaster.
  • Marcela: My contribution to the group work was to review the datasheets of the materials and extract the most important points.

Process

Safety data sheets Moldings:

Product: RTV PLATINUM 1510 Silicone Rubber

  • Manufacturer: Silika moldes e insumos
  • Excellent Flexibility and Elongation
  • Compatible with all addition-cure or platinum-cure silicones
  • Color: SEMI-TRANSLUCENT
  • Mixing Ratio: 1:1 by weight or VOLUME
  • Working Time: 15-20 minutes
  • Curing Time: 4-6 hours
  • Medium Viscosity
  • Does NOT require a catalyst

  • Product: Mold Release Wax

  • Manufacturer: MEGATIENDAS
  • Composition and Ingredients:
  • CNot classified as hazardous according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.
  • May cause slight skin and eye irritation.
  • May cause respiratory irritation if inhaled.
  • Natural or synthetic waxes
  • Petroleum distillates
  • Additives
  • Hazards Identification:
  • In case of inhalation, remove to fresh air. If experiencing respiratory discomfort, seek medical attention.
  • In case of eye contact, rinse cautiously with water for several minutes. Remove contact lenses if present and easy to do. Continue rinsing.
  • n case of ingestion, rinse mouth. Do not induce vomiting. Seek medical attention if symptoms occur..

  • Product: Polyurethane Rubber

  • Manufacturer: Silika Moldes e insumos
  • Composition:
  • Not classified as hazardous according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008
  • calcium sulfate hemihydrate
  • additives for setting and processing
  • May cause slight skin and eye irritation.
  • May cause respiratory irritation if inhaled.
  • Polyurethane elastomer composed of diisocyanates and polyols
  • Hazards Identification:
  • Not classified as hazardous.

  • Safety data sheets Castings:

    Product: Glycerin Soap with Chlorhexidine

    • Manufacturer: Glici
    • Composition and Ingredients:
    • Glycerin
    • Chlorhexidine
    • Hazards Identification:
    • Eye Irritation: May cause moderate irritation upon contact with eyes
    • Skin Sensitization: May cause allergic reactions in sensitive individuals.
    • Acute Toxicity: Low risk of acute toxicity from accidental ingestion in small amounts.

    • Product: Chocolate

    • Manufacturer: Donofrio
    • Composition and Ingredients:
    • Cocoa Mass/Cocoa Solids
    • Sugar
    • Cocoa Butter
    • Milk Solids
    • Emulsifiers
    • Flavorings
    • Hazards Identification:
    • Allergies: Chocolate contains ingredients such as milk, nuts, and soy, which can trigger allergies in susceptible individuals.

    • Product: Ceramic Plaster

    • Manufacturer: Martell
    • Composition:
    • Not classified as hazardous according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008
    • calcium sulfate hemihydrate
    • additives for setting and processing
    • In case of inhalation, remove to fresh air. If experiencing respiratory discomfort, seek medical attention.
    • In case of skin contact, wash off immediately with plenty of water.
    • In case of eye contact, rinse cautiously with water for several minutes. Remove contact lenses if present and easy to do. Continue rinsing.
    • Hazards Identification:
    • Not classified as hazardous.

    Make and compare test casts with each of them

  • For the group part we did different mold and casting tests
  • Using SLA resin technology, we designed and manufactured the pieces for which we wanted to make the molds.
  • We had already tested and tested this print in week 5: 3D printing, so we already knew that it had a much superior finish compared to other printing technologies.
  • With these designs, we proceeded to generate the molds with food grade RTV silicone rubber.
  • In addition, we use a wax mold to compare different experiments.
  • After having the molds, we did several tests of different types of materials.
  • This took us longer than expected because in some cases, such as the plaster, the finished piece broke because we thought it had already dried.
  • Finally, we did the test with wax and the results were very similar to those obtained with molds made of SLA printed parts.
  • Compare printing vs milling molds

    Costs 3D Printing:

    • Initial cost of a 3D printer can be lower than CNC milling machines, especially for entry-level models.
    • Material costs vary but can be high depending on the type of filament or resin used.
    • Minimal wastage as only the required material is used.
    • Generally lower labor costs as the process can be more automated.

    • Costs Milling:

    • CNC milling machines can have a higher initial cost and are much mor bigger.
    • Material costs can be lower as milling typically uses more common materials like metals and plastics.

    • Speed 3D Printing:

    • Slower. SLA technology even more slow.
    • Suitable for rapid prototyping and small batch production.
    • removing supports can add to the overall time.

    • Speed Milling

    • Can be faster for creating large molds, especially with high-speed CNC machines.
    • Suitable for mass production once the setup is complete. You manufacture one and the rest can use that model.
    • Often requires less post-processing compared to 3D printing. Only cleaning.

    • Material Properties 3D Printing:

    • Limited to materials that can be extruded or cured in layers, such as various plastics, resins, and some metals.
    • Mechanical properties can vary widely and may not be suitable for high-stress applications.
    • Newer materials and technologies (e.g., metal 3D printing) are expanding capabilities.

    • Material Properties in Milling

    • Can work with a wide range of materials, including metals, plastics, and composites.
    • Produces parts with excellent mechanical properties suitable for high-stress and high-temperature applications.
    • Material properties are consistent and well-understood.

    • Surface Finish 3D Printing:

    • Precision depends on the printer resolution and the material.
    • Typically, lower surface finish quality compared to milling, may require additional finishing steps.
    • Tolerances are generally less tight compared to milling, especially in complex geometries.

    • Surface Finish Milling

    • High precision and excellent surface finish, especially with modern CNC machines, better for the SLA 3d printer.
    • Capable of producing tight tolerances.