Face Scanning, Mold Design, 3D Printing and Casting Process
The group assignment focused on safety, material behavior, and process comparison for molding and casting. As a team we reviewed the available safety information for each material, made small test casts, and compared three mold-making technologies: CNC milling, TPU 3D printing, and resin 3D printing.
Before mixing or casting, the team reviewed the information available on the containers, labels, technical data, and product safety notes. The review focused on contact risk, ventilation, dust, heat, curing time, chemical residues, and safe disposal. The safest workflow depends on both the material and the technology used to make the mold.
| Material | Main Risks | Safety Conditions |
|---|---|---|
| TPU filament | Hot nozzle, hot bed, and fumes during printing. | Use the printer in a ventilated area, avoid touching hot parts, and wait before removing parts. |
| PLA filament | Hot surfaces and minor fumes during printing. | Use normal 3D printer safety procedures and keep the work area clear. |
| Photopolymer resin | Skin irritation, eye irritation, odor, uncured chemical residue, and UV exposure during curing. | Use nitrile gloves, eye protection, ventilation, covered resin handling, washing, UV post-curing, and no direct skin contact. |
| Candle wax / paraffin | Burns from melted material and fire risk if overheated. | Heat slowly, avoid open flame, use thermal gloves, and pour carefully. |
| Plaster | Dust inhalation during mixing and heat during curing. | Use a mask when mixing powder, avoid breathing dust, and clean spills immediately. |
| Silicone rubber | Skin contact with uncured silicone, catalyst exposure, contamination, and incomplete curing if mixed incorrectly. | Use gloves, safety glasses, clean cups, accurate ratios, ventilation, and respect pot life and curing time. |
| MDF for CNC milling | Fine dust, machine movement, cutting tools, and noise. | Use dust extraction, mask, eye protection, hearing protection, and keep hands away from the toolpath. |
Different casting materials were tested to compare handling, surface finish, demolding, detail reproduction, and safety requirements. The same face geometry helped compare how each material reacted with different mold fabrication technologies.
| Test Cast | Behavior | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Wax / paraffin | Easy to melt and pour, but requires heat control. | Useful for quick tests and visual validation of the face shape. |
| Plaster | Easy to mix, captures details, and cures into a rigid piece. | Good low-cost option, but powder handling requires respiratory protection. |
| Silicone rubber | Flexible after curing, reusable, and useful for demolding complex shapes. | Best option for a reusable flexible negative mold from the CNC master, but sensitive to mixing ratio. |
| Resin printed mold | High detail and smooth surface, but needs chemical safety controls. | Best surface definition, with stricter PPE and post-curing requirements. |
Three mold fabrication technologies were compared: CNC milling, TPU 3D printing, and resin 3D printing. Each method produced a different type of mold and required different safety precautions.
CNC milling was used to create a rigid MDF master mold from the scanned face. This method produced a strong base and allowed the silicone rubber mold to be cast from a physical master. Its main safety concerns were machine operation, dust extraction, cutting tools, and eye protection.
TPU printing created flexible mold parts. Its advantage was easier demolding because the mold could deform slightly. The limitation was surface texture from FFF layer lines, which can transfer to the cast if the printed surface is not sealed or post-processed.
Resin printing provided the best surface definition and captured small details more clearly. However, it required stricter chemical safety: nitrile gloves, mask, ventilation, cleaning of uncured resin, and UV post-curing.
| Technology | Strength | Limitation | Safety Emphasis |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNC milling | Rigid master mold and good structural stability. | Requires dust management and machine setup. | Dust extraction, eye protection, hearing protection, safe machine operation. |
| TPU printing | Flexible mold and easier demolding. | Visible layer lines and slower printing. | Hot nozzle/bed safety and ventilation. |
| Resin printing | High detail and smooth finish. | Requires cleaning, supports, and UV post-curing. | Nitrile gloves, mask, ventilation, no skin contact with uncured resin. |
The comparison showed that no single molding method is best for every case. CNC milling is useful for producing a strong master mold, TPU printing is useful for flexible molds, and resin printing is the best option when surface detail is the priority. Safety conditions change significantly between processes: CNC requires machine and dust safety, TPU requires 3D printer heat safety, and resin requires chemical protection and post-curing.
The main lesson from the group test was that material choice and mold-making technology must be decided together. A high-detail resin mold is not automatically better if the available safety workflow is weak. A CNC master is more stable for silicone casting, while TPU can help with demolding when flexibility is more important than surface finish.