CNC Machining — MultiCam 3000

In the group assignment, we explored how to operate the MultiCam 3000 CNC machine. We tested several parameters including runout, alignment, fixturing methods, speeds, feeds, materials, and toolpaths. Through these tests, we observed how each parameter affects the machining process and compared different configurations to determine the best settings for the material and cutting conditions.

Fab Academy ULima — explore the full group assignment documentation on the official page:
fabacademy.org/2026/labs/ulima/ ↗

Lab Safety Training

Lab safety training is essential before operating high-speed CNC machines. It covers how to work safely, understand potential risks, and prevent accidents in the lab.

Eye protection

Wear protective glasses at all times to avoid chips or debris projected during machining.

>>>

Hearing protection

Use hearing protection to reduce noise exposure from the spindle and router during operation.

No loose clothing

Avoid loose clothing, jewelry, or accessories that may get caught in moving parts of the machine.

No touching spindle

Never touch the spindle, tool, or cutting area while the machine is operating — even if it appears to have stopped.

Gloves — when to use

Use gloves only when handling material or cleaning the area. Remove them before operating the machine.

Dust mask

Use a mask when machining materials that produce dust, such as MDF or composites.

Dust extraction hose connection under the machine
Img 5 — Dust extraction connectionHighlighted circle shows the hose connection point for the external dust extraction system at the base of the MultiCam 3000. Active during all machining operations to capture chips and fine dust particles — essential when cutting plywood and MDF.
Machine power switch and external dust collector bag
Img 6 — Power switch & dust collectorLeft: machine power switch with green indicator light — confirms the machine is powered and ready. Right: external dust collection bag unit beside the MultiCam 3000 — collects all material removed during machining to keep the lab environment safe.

Equipment

Machine Specifications — MultiCam 3000

3-axis CNC Router · 1270 × 2540 mm working area
MultiCam 3000 CNC router full view
Img 1 — MultiCam 3000 Series CNC RouterFull view of the machine in the Fab Lab ULima space. Yellow dust extraction hose visible overhead. Gantry spanning the full 1270 × 2540 mm working area. Plywood sheet on sacrificial bed showing previous machining marks. Emergency stop visible on the right side panel.

The MultiCam 3000 Series CNC Router is the machine used for this assignment. It allows large-scale machining of materials such as plywood, MDF, plastics, and composite materials using computer-controlled toolpaths.

SpecificationValue
Machine ModelMultiCam 3000 Series CNC Router
Number of Axes3-axis (X, Y, Z)
Working AreaApproximately 1270 mm × 2540 mm
Drive SystemRack and pinion (X, Y) · Ball screw (Z)
Spindle SpeedUp to 24,000 RPM
Tool TypeEnd mill router bit
Dust CollectionExternal dust extraction system
Work SurfaceSacrificial bed
MultiCam 3000 close-up spindle and clamps
Img 2 — Spindle & fixturing clamps detailClose-up of the MultiCam 3000 gantry showing the spindle assembly with brush guard, tool collet, and the mechanical clamps used to hold the material sheet to the sacrificial bed. Clamp positions must be considered when setting the origin margin.
MultiCam 3000 handheld pendant controller annotated
Img 3 — Handheld pendant controller — annotatedEmergency stop (red) at top. Key functions annotated: Play (start job), Spindle RPM increase/decrease, Green arrows = Nozzle movement (Jog), Confirm / Tool selection buttons. Lower-left + Up arrow = Set origin point (0,0). Lower-left + Down arrow = Load last origin point.
Foot pedal for MultiCam 3000
Img 4 — Foot pedalTwo-button foot pedal used to control vacuum fixturing or confirm operations on the MultiCam 3000 without leaving the machine area. Allows hands-free confirmation during material loading and fixturing steps.

Cutting Parameters

For machining the plywood sheet (18 mm thickness), the following cutting parameters were selected to achieve stable cutting and avoid burning the material.

ParameterValue
MaterialPlywood (Triplay) — 18 mm thickness
ToolEnd mill — 6 mm diameter
Spindle speed18,000 RPM
Feed rate120 mm/min
Cut depth per pass6.17 mm
Number of passes3 passes
Total cut depth18.5 mm
Z-probe tool height calibration sensor
Img 7 — Z-probe tool height calibrationLeft: hand-placing the Z-probe plate under the tool for automatic height calibration. Right: tool positioned over the Z-probe sensor resting on the sacrificial bed surface. The machine lowers the tool until contact is detected — this sets Z=0 and compensates for tool length differences automatically, directly affecting runout and depth accuracy.

Tabs / Bridges Test

One of the important tests performed was the use of tabs (bridges). Tabs are small connections left in the toolpath that keep the piece attached to the material sheet during machining. Their purpose is to prevent the piece from moving or being ejected when the final contour is cut. After machining, the tabs are manually removed during the finishing stage.

Why tabs are needed

When the CNC cuts the final contour, the part becomes fully free from the sheet. Without tabs, the piece can move or spin into the tool, causing damage or a safety hazard.

How tabs work

Small uncut bridges are left at intervals around the contour. They hold the part in place throughout the job and are broken or cut off by hand after the machine finishes.

Tabs bridges on machined plywood pieces and CNC cutting contour
Img 18 — Tabs (bridges) on machined piecesLeft: two plywood pieces removed from the sheet — green arrows point to the tab break-off marks where the bridges held the parts during machining. Right: CNC actively cutting the board contour — the tabs visible along the edge keep the piece stationary until the job finishes. Caption confirms: tabs prevent pieces from moving while the CNC is cutting the contour.

Press-fit Tolerance Test

To determine the correct press-fit tolerance, several test slots were designed before machining the final model. Tests started at 18.0 mm and increased gradually to 18.5 mm in 0.1 mm increments, allowing observation of how tight or loose the joint becomes at each step.

18.0

Very tight — difficult to assemble

18.1

Tight — requires force

18.2

Snug — good friction fit

18.3

Press-fit — firm and clean

18.4

Loose — slides easily

18.5

Too loose — no friction

Physical press-fit tolerance test pieces 18.1 to 18.5mm
Img 19 — Physical press-fit tolerance test — 18.1 to 18.5 mmLeft: five machined slot pieces labeled 18.1 through 18.5 mm with their corresponding inserts — each slot is 0.1 mm wider than the last. Right: assembled view showing 18.5 mm (top, very loose — slides freely) vs 18.0 mm (bottom, very tight — barely accepts the insert). The best press-fit result was found at 18.3 mm, confirming the tolerance range for 18 mm plywood on this machine.
Press-fit sketch showing corner relief size and dimension 19.769mm
Img 14 — Press-fit tolerance sketch — 19.769 mm dimensionFusion 360 sketch showing side-by-side comparison of the three corner relief geometries (T-Bone top, Semi Dog-Bone center, Dog-Bone bottom) with the joint dimension annotated at 19.769 mm. This comparative view was used to verify that each relief strategy maintains correct joint width before generating the DXF for the CAM software.

Individual Contribution

Internal Corner Relief Strategies

My individual contribution focused on modeling the different corner relief strategies in Autodesk Fusion 360, creating parametric sketches to control key dimensions, and running simulation tests to observe how the joints behave during assembly.

Why Corner Relief is Necessary

When machining parts with a CNC router, internal corners cannot be perfectly sharp because the cutting tool is cylindrical. This leaves a radius in pockets or slots — when assembling square components, the rounded internal corner prevents the part from fully seating. Corner relief strategies add small circular cuts at internal corners to create enough clearance for square parts to properly assemble.

Fusion 360 three corner relief strategy sketches
Img 10 — Fusion 360 — three corner relief sketchesSide-by-side parametric sketches for the three strategies in Fusion 360. Left column: T-Bone relief — circle center aligned to one edge. Center column: Semi Dog-Bone — circle offset so corner touches the circumference. Right column: Dog-Bone — circle centered exactly on the corner. All sketches are driven by shared user parameters (tool diameter, material thickness).
Strategy 01

Dog-Bone

  • Center coincides with corner
  • Relief extends diagonally outward
  • Maximum clearance
  • Most visible relief on finished part
Strategy 02

T-Bone

  • Center aligned with one edge
  • Relief on one axis only
  • Less material removed
  • Cleaner visual result than dog-bone
Winner ✓
Strategy 03

Semi Dog-Bone

  • Circle offset from corner
  • Corner touches circumference, not center
  • Most discrete relief
  • Best aesthetic finish
  • Sufficient clearance for assembly
Fusion 360 Dogbones v6 sketch with encaje
Img 12 — Dogbones v6 — sketch with joint slotFusion 360 sketch view of the combined Dog-Bone model (Dogbones v6): base piece with three relief types visible on the top bar, and the mating encaje (insert) piece below showing the corresponding slot geometry. Navigator tree shows separate bodies and sketch layers for each component.
Fusion 360 Dogbones v6 3D render base and encaje
Img 13 — Dogbones v6 — 3D solid model3D solid view of the final combined test piece: top = base principal with all three dog-bone reliefs cut in; bottom = encaje (mating insert) with the corresponding tab geometry. Orange highlight shows the assembly origin reference. This is the model used to generate the DXF for enRoute.

Parametric Simulation in Fusion 360

Using parametric design ensures that if the tool size or material changes, the geometry updates automatically without needing to redesign the model from scratch. All three corner relief strategies were modeled this way.

Parameters used

  • Tool diameter: 6 mm
  • Material thickness: 9.4 mm
  • Joint dimensions based on tool radius

Sketch constraints

  • Project Geometry
  • Coincident Constraint
  • Tangent Constraint
  • Construction Lines
  • Midpoint Constraint
Test 1

Individual Bone Tests

Each corner relief strategy was analyzed individually. The mating parts were designed so they engaged with approximately half of the bone relief — allowing observation of how each strategy affects fitting and clearance independently before combining them.

Order tested: T-Bone · Semi Dog-Bone · Dog-Bone

Fusion 360 user parameters Test 1
Img 8 — Fusion 360 user parameters — Test 1 (Individual bones)Parameters panel showing Test 1 configuration: largo = 150 mm, altura = 70 mm, grosor = 9.4 mm, cortelaser = 9.6 mm, largobone = 80 mm, fresa = 6 mm. These values drive the individual bone test pieces — each piece tests one corner relief strategy in isolation with approximately half-bone engagement.
Test 2

Combined Bone Test

A single test board containing all three corner relief strategies was designed so that joints engaged with more than half of the bone relief. This allowed direct comparison of all strategies under slightly different fitting conditions on the same machined piece.

Fusion 360 user parameters Test 2
Img 9 — Fusion 360 user parameters — Test 2 (Combined bone)Parameters panel showing Test 2 configuration: largo = 250 mm (wider piece), altura = 80 mm, ancho = 9.4 mm, cuaŀcorte = 92 mm, largobone = 50 mm, fresa = 6 mm. Larger dimensions accommodate all three relief strategies side by side on a single base piece — enabling direct comparison with consistent machining conditions.
Fusion 360 six piece 3D solid model combined test
Img 11 — Fusion 360 — 6-piece combined test solid model3D solid view of all six components for the combined bone test: three base pieces (top row) each with a different corner relief strategy, and three corresponding encaje (insert) pieces (bottom row). This layout mirrors the enRoute CAM positioning before generating G-code for the MultiCam 3000.

Fusion 360 → Inventor → MultiCam Workflow

The complete workflow from parametric CAD model to physical machined part.

01
Fusion 360

Parametric sketch with corner relief strategies. User parameters control tool diameter and joint dimensions.

02
Inventor

Export to Autodesk Inventor to generate the DXF file for the CAM software.

03
enRoute

Import DXF into enRoute CAM. Position pieces with ~20 mm margin on each axis. Configure machining parameters and generate G-code.

04
MultiCam 3000

Send job to machine. Monitor cutting, check tabs, and verify first pass before full run.

05
Finishing

Remove tabs manually. Test assembly of press-fit joints and evaluate corner relief performance.

enRoute tip: When positioning pieces in enRoute, leave a margin of approximately 20 mm on each axis before filling in the machining parameters. This avoids the tool approaching the edge clamps or sacrificial bed fasteners.
enRoute CAM cutting parameters dialog
Img 15 — enRoute CAM — cutting parameters dialogenRoute "Desplazado del encaminador" (Router Offset) dialog with the Parámetros de corte panel open. Tool: Fresa 6mm. Feed rate (Alimentación y Velocidades): 120.000 mm/min. Final pass feed: 120.000 mm/min. Spindle speed (Velocidad de eje): 18,000 RPM. Bridge height (Subida): 10.000 mm. These are the exact parameters used for all machining runs on the MultiCam 3000.

Test Results

Assembled press-fit plywood joint side view
Img 16 — Press-fit joint assembled — side viewFinal assembled press-fit joint showing the vertical panel seated cleanly into the horizontal base slot. The joint holds by friction alone — no glue or fasteners. Clean cut edges visible on both pieces confirm correct tool depth and feed rate settings.
Machined plywood piece with slot and dog-bone corner relief
Img 17 — Machined piece — slot with corner relief visibleFront view of a machined plywood test piece showing the full slot opening with corner relief clearly visible at both ends. The slot walls are clean and the corner radius left by the 6 mm tool is evident — this is exactly the geometry that requires dog-bone or semi dog-bone relief to allow square mating parts to fully seat.
Observation

Semi Dog-Bone — Fit Requires Slight Force

In the Semi Dog-Bone test, the joint fit but required some force to assemble — indicating the relief circle was slightly small for the actual machined radius. This means exact measurement of tool diameter and material thickness is critical for a perfect fit. Even small deviations accumulate across a joint.

Winner: Semi Dog-Bone

As demonstrated by the test results, the Semi Dog-Bone produced the best outcome across all three strategies. The relief is far less visually noticeable, the circular cutout blends more naturally into the geometry, and it maintains sufficient clearance for proper assembly — making it the ideal choice for furniture and visible structural components.

Advantages of Semi Dog-Bone

Best aesthetic finish

The relief is far less visually noticeable compared to standard Dog-Bone, where the full circle is visible from the front face.

Natural blending

The circular cutout blends more naturally into the geometry — it does not interrupt the line of the slot as aggressively as the other strategies.

Sufficient clearance

Maintains enough clearance for proper assembly while removing less material than a full Dog-Bone relief.

Ideal for furniture

Best suited for furniture and visible components where joint appearance matters as much as structural performance.

Individual Reflections

What each team member learned from this week's assignment.

Nicolas

Working on the corner relief strategies made me realize that CNC machining forces you to design with the tool in mind — not just the final geometry. A perfectly square pocket in CAD becomes a rounded pocket on the machine, and that gap between intention and reality has to be resolved through design decisions rather than post-processing. Modeling all three strategies parametrically in Fusion 360 also showed me how much time parametric constraints save: changing the tool diameter updated every relief circle instantly. The Semi Dog-Bone result confirmed that the best engineering solution is often the one that balances function and appearance rather than maximizing one at the expense of the other.

Micaela

The press-fit tolerance test was the most instructive part of this week for me. Starting at 18.0 mm and stepping up in 0.1 mm increments made it clear that what feels like a small number on paper produces a very noticeable difference in assembly feel. The tabs test also changed how I think about CNC toolpaths — I had not considered that a fully cut contour leaves the part free to move and potentially collide with the tool. Understanding why tabs exist, and seeing them in the machined piece, made the whole fixturing concept much more concrete than any diagram would have.