Group Assignment: Test runout, alignment, fixturing, speeds, feeds, materials, and toolpaths for your CNC machine.
In the group assignment, we explored how to operate the MultiCam 3000 CNC machine. We tested several parameters including runout, alignment, fixturing methods, speeds, feeds, materials, and toolpaths. Through these tests, we observed how each parameter affects the machining process and compared different configurations to determine the best settings for the material and cutting conditions.
Lab safety training is essential before operating high-speed CNC machines. It covers how to work safely, understand potential risks, and prevent accidents in the lab.
Wear protective glasses at all times to avoid chips or debris projected during machining.
Use hearing protection to reduce noise exposure from the spindle and router during operation.
Avoid loose clothing, jewelry, or accessories that may get caught in moving parts of the machine.
Never touch the spindle, tool, or cutting area while the machine is operating — even if it appears to have stopped.
Use gloves only when handling material or cleaning the area. Remove them before operating the machine.
Use a mask when machining materials that produce dust, such as MDF or composites.
Equipment
The MultiCam 3000 Series CNC Router is the machine used for this assignment. It allows large-scale machining of materials such as plywood, MDF, plastics, and composite materials using computer-controlled toolpaths.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Machine Model | MultiCam 3000 Series CNC Router |
| Number of Axes | 3-axis (X, Y, Z) |
| Working Area | Approximately 1270 mm × 2540 mm |
| Drive System | Rack and pinion (X, Y) · Ball screw (Z) |
| Spindle Speed | Up to 24,000 RPM |
| Tool Type | End mill router bit |
| Dust Collection | External dust extraction system |
| Work Surface | Sacrificial bed |
For machining the plywood sheet (18 mm thickness), the following cutting parameters were selected to achieve stable cutting and avoid burning the material.
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Material | Plywood (Triplay) — 18 mm thickness |
| Tool | End mill — 6 mm diameter |
| Spindle speed | 18,000 RPM |
| Feed rate | 120 mm/min |
| Cut depth per pass | 6.17 mm |
| Number of passes | 3 passes |
| Total cut depth | 18.5 mm |
One of the important tests performed was the use of tabs (bridges). Tabs are small connections left in the toolpath that keep the piece attached to the material sheet during machining. Their purpose is to prevent the piece from moving or being ejected when the final contour is cut. After machining, the tabs are manually removed during the finishing stage.
When the CNC cuts the final contour, the part becomes fully free from the sheet. Without tabs, the piece can move or spin into the tool, causing damage or a safety hazard.
Small uncut bridges are left at intervals around the contour. They hold the part in place throughout the job and are broken or cut off by hand after the machine finishes.
To determine the correct press-fit tolerance, several test slots were designed before machining the final model. Tests started at 18.0 mm and increased gradually to 18.5 mm in 0.1 mm increments, allowing observation of how tight or loose the joint becomes at each step.
Very tight — difficult to assemble
Tight — requires force
Snug — good friction fit
Press-fit — firm and clean
Loose — slides easily
Too loose — no friction
Individual Contribution
My individual contribution focused on modeling the different corner relief strategies in Autodesk Fusion 360, creating parametric sketches to control key dimensions, and running simulation tests to observe how the joints behave during assembly.
When machining parts with a CNC router, internal corners cannot be perfectly sharp because the cutting tool is cylindrical. This leaves a radius in pockets or slots — when assembling square components, the rounded internal corner prevents the part from fully seating. Corner relief strategies add small circular cuts at internal corners to create enough clearance for square parts to properly assemble.
Using parametric design ensures that if the tool size or material changes, the geometry updates automatically without needing to redesign the model from scratch. All three corner relief strategies were modeled this way.
Each corner relief strategy was analyzed individually. The mating parts were designed so they engaged with approximately half of the bone relief — allowing observation of how each strategy affects fitting and clearance independently before combining them.
Order tested: T-Bone · Semi Dog-Bone · Dog-Bone
A single test board containing all three corner relief strategies was designed so that joints engaged with more than half of the bone relief. This allowed direct comparison of all strategies under slightly different fitting conditions on the same machined piece.
The complete workflow from parametric CAD model to physical machined part.
Parametric sketch with corner relief strategies. User parameters control tool diameter and joint dimensions.
Export to Autodesk Inventor to generate the DXF file for the CAM software.
Import DXF into enRoute CAM. Position pieces with ~20 mm margin on each axis. Configure machining parameters and generate G-code.
Send job to machine. Monitor cutting, check tabs, and verify first pass before full run.
Remove tabs manually. Test assembly of press-fit joints and evaluate corner relief performance.
In the Semi Dog-Bone test, the joint fit but required some force to assemble — indicating the relief circle was slightly small for the actual machined radius. This means exact measurement of tool diameter and material thickness is critical for a perfect fit. Even small deviations accumulate across a joint.
As demonstrated by the test results, the Semi Dog-Bone produced the best outcome across all three strategies. The relief is far less visually noticeable, the circular cutout blends more naturally into the geometry, and it maintains sufficient clearance for proper assembly — making it the ideal choice for furniture and visible structural components.
The relief is far less visually noticeable compared to standard Dog-Bone, where the full circle is visible from the front face.
The circular cutout blends more naturally into the geometry — it does not interrupt the line of the slot as aggressively as the other strategies.
Maintains enough clearance for proper assembly while removing less material than a full Dog-Bone relief.
Best suited for furniture and visible components where joint appearance matters as much as structural performance.
What each team member learned from this week's assignment.
Working on the corner relief strategies made me realize that CNC machining forces you to design with the tool in mind — not just the final geometry. A perfectly square pocket in CAD becomes a rounded pocket on the machine, and that gap between intention and reality has to be resolved through design decisions rather than post-processing. Modeling all three strategies parametrically in Fusion 360 also showed me how much time parametric constraints save: changing the tool diameter updated every relief circle instantly. The Semi Dog-Bone result confirmed that the best engineering solution is often the one that balances function and appearance rather than maximizing one at the expense of the other.
The press-fit tolerance test was the most instructive part of this week for me. Starting at 18.0 mm and stepping up in 0.1 mm increments made it clear that what feels like a small number on paper produces a very noticeable difference in assembly feel. The tabs test also changed how I think about CNC toolpaths — I had not considered that a fully cut contour leaves the part free to move and potentially collide with the tool. Understanding why tabs exist, and seeing them in the machined piece, made the whole fixturing concept much more concrete than any diagram would have.
© Fablab Ulima 2025 | Design: Tooplate