Assigments

Foto de perfil

Week 5: 3D Scanning and Printing

Group assignment:

  • Test the design rules for your 3D printer(s)
  • Document your work on the group work page and reflect on your individual page what you learned about characteristics of your printer(s)

Individual assignments:

  • Design, document and 3D print an object (small, few cm3, limited by printer time) that could not be easily made subtractively
  • 3D scan an object (and optionally print it)

Week 5 – 3D Scanning and Printing

Week 5 — 3D Scanning and Printing

I) GROUP ASSIGNMENT
Test the design rules for your 3D printer(s), document the work on the group page, and reflect on what you learned about the characteristics of your printer(s).

1. Carmen

3D Printer
The Artillery Genius Pro.
This machine has a working area of 220 mm × 220 mm × 250 mm, a printing speed of 60 mm/s to 150 mm/s, a 0.4 mm extruder, a maximum consumption of 10 V and 500 W (with the heated bed turned on), and an XYZ printing resolution of 0.05 mm, 0.05 mm, and 0.1 mm.
The slicing program used was Ultimaker Cura version 5.5.0.

Common materials you can use
✔️ PLA (polylactic acid) – easy to print, ideal for beginners.
✔️ ABS – harder and stronger, but it can warp if temperature is not controlled.
✔️ PETG / flexible PET – a good combination of strength and flexibility.
✔️ TPU / flexible filament – the direct extruder makes printing flexibles easier.
✔️ “Wood” filaments (PLA with wood particles) – decorative effect.
✔️ PVA and HIPS – soluble or special support filaments.

Image 1 placeholder
Image 1

To perform a 3D print with the Artillery Genius Pro using Ultimaker Cura, you must first download and install the program from its official website, ensuring you choose the version compatible with your operating system. Once installed, open the software and add the printer using “Add printer”, configuring it as a custom printer (Custom FFF Printer) and entering its working dimensions (220 × 220 × 250 mm), 0.4 mm nozzle, and 1.75 mm filament. Before starting any print, bed leveling is essential: preheat the printer, place a sheet of paper between the nozzle and the print surface, and adjust the screws at the four corners until you feel slight friction on the paper.

Image 2 placeholder
Image 2
Image 3 placeholder
Image 3

Then, import the STL file into the program, verify the model is correctly placed on the build plate, and make any necessary adjustments such as scale, rotation, or centering. Next, configure printing parameters according to the material used; for example, for PLA it is recommended: nozzle temperature 200 °C, bed temperature 55–60 °C, layer height 0.2 mm, and a slightly higher initial layer to improve adhesion. Once parameters are set, run the slicing process (Slice) to generate a G-code file. Finally, save it to a USB drive, insert it into the printer, select the file from the touchscreen, and start the print—closely supervising the first layer to ensure good adhesion and final quality.

Image 4 placeholder
Image 4
Image 5 placeholder
Image 5
Image 6 placeholder
Image 6
Image 7 placeholder
Image 7

Test without supports
On the Artillery Genius Pro, tests without supports allow you to verify correct calibration and performance when printing steep angles. The machine completes most models without support structures, demonstrating good thermal stability and extruder control.

TEST WITH SUPPORTS
On the Artillery Genius Pro, the support test verified proper performance on models with overhangs and complex geometry. By enabling support generation in Ultimaker Cura, better stability during printing and a more precise finish were achieved in critical zones compared to the no-support test. Supports were generated correctly and could be removed relatively easily at the end, showing correct configuration and solid overall performance.

Image 8 placeholder
Image 8
Image 9 placeholder
Image 9

In the surface finish test, the Artillery Genius Pro printed the model as designed; however, a slight filament excess was observed, creating strings and a less clean finish compared to the reference piece. To optimize results, the printer was calibrated using filament manufacturer recommended temperatures, ensuring adequate parameters and reducing potential failures. In later tests, progressive improvements in surface quality were observed thanks to better tuning of retraction, flow, and temperature, although there is still room for optimization to reach a finer and more precise finish.

Image 10 placeholder
Image 10
Image 11 placeholder
Image 11
Image 12 placeholder
Image 12

The 3D printing experience allowed me to understand that the technology depends not only on the machine, but on the knowledge and precision used to configure and calibrate it. Working with the Artillery Genius Pro taught me that small adjustments in temperature, leveling, or retraction can make a big difference in the final result. Each test, even those with imperfections, became an opportunity for learning and continuous improvement. In addition, using tools like Ultimaker Cura helped me better understand the digital manufacturing process, strengthening my skills in design and prototyping. Ultimately, 3D printing not only accelerates project development, but also encourages experimentation, patience, and constant optimization.

2. David

PRINTER: CREALITY K1 SE
Print volume: 220 × 220 × 250 mm
Maximum speed: Up to 600 mm/s (with acceleration up to 20,000 mm/s²).
Extruder: Dual Gear Direct Drive (direct drive with double gear for firm filament grip and stable feeding).
Standard nozzle diameter: 0.4 mm (can be changed if needed).

Key features
● Tri-metal nozzle (copper with steel tip and titanium heatbreak), wear resistant, blocks heat-creep and is easy to change.
● CoreXY system, providing higher speed and movement precision with less vibration.
● Hands-free auto leveling to adjust the bed easily.
● Flexible PEI-coated plate for easy part removal.

Slicer: Creality Print

Common materials you can use
PLA: the easiest filament to print, ideal for decorative parts and prototypes with low heat requirements.
Hyper PLA: a PLA version optimized for higher speed printing without losing quality.
PETG: more resistant and flexible than PLA, ideal for mechanical parts or outdoor use.
TPU: flexible and elastic material, perfect for covers, seals, or parts that need to bend.

Image 13 placeholder
Image 13

The main slicer for the K1 SE is Creality Print. The program is optimized for wireless connection because it is from the same manufacturer. It also includes three default print options for first-time users. It has more advanced parameter options as well, but it still maintains a friendly interface.

Image 14 placeholder
Image 14

Tests performed on the K1 SE

In the first test, we printed without supports to see the finish of the part without the support option. The program shows a warning message before slicing.

Image 15 placeholder
Image 15

In the second test, we used automatic supports, “normal” type, following the same default parameters as before.

Image 16 placeholder
Image 16
Image 17 placeholder
Image 17
Image 18 placeholder
Image 18
Image 19 placeholder
Image 19

Without supports, it only loses shape on the bottom part.

Image 20 placeholder
Image 20

With tree supports, a uniform finish is noticeable, and when removing them, small tree contact points remain.

Image 21 placeholder
Image 21

With normal supports, this test shows a better finish because supports are removed linearly, blending with the straight shape.

Image 22 placeholder
Image 22

Clearance test

In the “clearance” test, we used automatic normal supports and a layer height of 0.20. After printing, we realized this support type is not highly recommended because it adhered to the bottom base, making cleaning difficult. The result shows the best clearances with these parameters start from 1 down to 0.4, because the last ones are very difficult to move or rotate.

Image 23 placeholder
Image 23
Image 24 placeholder
Image 24
Image 25 placeholder
Image 25

3. Esteban

3D Printer — Bambu Lab A1 / A1 Combo
Print volume: 256 mm × 256 mm × 256 mm.
Maximum speed: Up to 500 mm/s (with acceleration up to 10,000 mm/s²).
Extruder: 0.4 mm stainless steel nozzle (Quick Swap system).
Key features: full auto leveling, active flow compensation, and vibration calibration. In the Combo version, includes AMS Lite for multicolor printing (up to 4 filaments).
Slicer: Bambu Studio.

Common materials you can use
✔️ PLA (Polylactic Acid): ideal for fast printing with high aesthetic quality.
✔️ PETG: greater mechanical and thermal resistance, easy to print on the A1.
✔️ TPU (Flexible): excellent performance thanks to the A1 direct extruder.
✔️ PVA/HIPS: soluble supports (ideally using AMS Lite for interfaces).

Image 26 placeholder
Image 26

To perform a 3D print with the Bambu Lab A1 using Bambu Studio, the first step is to download and install the software from the official Bambu Lab site. Once inside, select the printer (A1 or A1 Combo) and nozzle type (0.4 mm) from the device list, or sync automatically if it is connected to the network. Unlike older printers, manual paper leveling is not needed. Before starting, the A1 runs an automatic calibration that measures bed leveling, motor resonance, and extruder flow pressure, ensuring a perfect first layer without human intervention. If using the Combo, the AMS Lite slots are also configured with the corresponding colors.

Image 27 placeholder
Image 27
Image 28 placeholder
Image 28
Image 29 placeholder
Image 29
Image 30 placeholder
Image 30

Next, we import the test files—in this case anisotropy.stl, finish.stl and angle.stl—into the Bambu Studio workspace. We check orientation to optimize strength and reduce supports, and apply scaling or rotation if needed. Parameters are configured according to the material (e.g., for Bambu Basic PLA: nozzle at 220 °C and bed at 65 °C). Once defined, we click “Slice Plate” to generate the G-code. Finally, we send the file via Wi-Fi directly to the printer or save it to the SD card. From the A1 touchscreen (or Bambu Handy app), the print is started while trusting the sensors to monitor flow quality and adhesion.

Image 31 placeholder
Image 31
Image 32 placeholder
Image 32

Face quality test (anisotropy.stl): This model is an “L”-shaped part placed vertically. Its main purpose is to evaluate the surface quality of vertical faces. When printing on the Bambu Lab A1, it verified Z-axis stability and extrusion consistency, producing flat and uniform faces.

Image 33 placeholder
Image 33
Image 34 placeholder
Image 34

Overhang test (angle.stl): This test verifies layer cooling fan performance. The machine prints steep angles without supports thanks to excellent cooling and stability, maintaining dimensional fidelity even on aggressive inclines.
● Results: the Bambu Lab A1 demonstrated excellent cooling, printing without supports and without problems up to 30 degrees of inclination.
● Machine limit: from 20°, 10° and 0°, overhang becomes evident. At these more extreme angles, layers lose ideal alignment and loose or drooping filament appears, indicating the point where supports become mandatory.

Image 35 placeholder
Image 35
Image 36 placeholder
Image 36
Image 37 placeholder
Image 37

Finish test (finish.stl): This model includes two spheres (one extruded and one subtracted). For this test, the adaptive layer height tool in Bambu Studio was used in two versions:
● Option A (Moderate variation): base layer height 0.28 mm for most of the print to save time; near the top curves, layer height automatically reduced to 0.12 mm to improve resolution.
● Option B (High resolution): more aggressive adaptive setup; straight zones at 0.28 mm, but curved/detailed zones reduced to 0.08 mm. This removes most “stair-stepping” and produces a much smoother surface finish.

Image 38 placeholder
Image 38
Image 39 placeholder
Image 39
Image 40 placeholder
Image 40
Image 41 placeholder
Image 41

4. Jianfranco

3D Printer — Prusa XL
Print volume: 360 × 360 × 360 mm
Maximum speed: Up to 250 mm/s (maximum acceleration approx. 5000 mm/s²).
Extruder: 0.4 mm stainless steel nozzle (Quick Swap system).
Key features: large build volume, high precision CoreXY, and (5-toolhead version) five independent toolheads for multi-material/multi-color printing with automatic tool changing.
Slicer: PrusaSlicer, OrcaSlicer

Common materials you can use
✔️ PLA: ideal for fast printing with high aesthetic quality.
✔️ PETG: greater mechanical and thermal resistance, easy to print.
✔️ TPU (Flexible): excellent performance thanks to the direct extruder.
✔️ PVA/HIPS: soluble supports.

Image 42 placeholder
Image 42

To print with the Prusa XL using Orca Slicer (open-source), first download the program from GitHub and install it. Configuration is very easy: choose the printer type and the material, then import the STL file. Unlike single extruder printers, this printer does not require purging other than the purge tower; with 5 toolheads, it can print up to 5 different colors or materials.

Image 43 placeholder
Image 43
Image 44 placeholder
Image 44
Image 45 placeholder
Image 45
Image 46 placeholder
Image 46

To import an STL file in OrcaSlicer, open the software and ensure the correct printer and filament profiles are selected. Then click “Open File” or drag and drop the STL into the workspace. Once the model appears on the virtual build plate, adjust position, scale, or orientation if needed. After verifying placement, click “Slice” to generate toolpaths, preview layers, and export the G-code for printing.

Image 47 placeholder
Image 47
Image 48 placeholder
Image 48

Next, we imported test files—in this case retraction test.stl and temperature.stl—onto the Prusa XL build plate. We verified orientation to optimize strength and reduce supports, and adjusted scale/rotation if necessary. Parameters were set according to the material (e.g., for Bambu Basic PLA: nozzle at 220°C and bed at 65°C). Once defined, we clicked “Slice” to generate the G-code. Finally, we sent the file via USB, since this printer uses its own USB drive. From the touchscreen, we started the print, trusting the printer’s sensors to monitor flow and adhesion.

Image 49 placeholder
Image 49
Image 50 placeholder
Image 50

Once the STL files were printed, we reviewed results to identify parameters we could change for this material, such as overhangs, temperature, and necessary tolerances to achieve optimal print outcomes.

Image 51 placeholder
Image 51
Image 52 placeholder
Image 52

5. Cindy

For print tests, the Bestgee T300S pro printer was used with the following characteristics:

Image 53 placeholder
Image 53

Printer configuration (With supports)

For the first tests, supports were enabled with these parameters:
● Profile: 0.2 mm
● Infill: 20%
● Support: Enabled
● Print temperature: 215 °C
● Bed adhesion: Brim
● Printer: Ender 3
Supports were necessary in designs with strong overhangs and free spaces because, without an auxiliary structure, melted material tends to sag toward the nearest surface, affecting accuracy and finish.

● We entered the Ultimaker Cura page and downloaded the software.
● We clicked to download Ultimaker Cura.

Image 55 placeholder
Image 55

● We installed Ultimaker Cura and chose the printer type: CUSTOM FFF PRINTER.
● We located the repository to download the files in .stl format: https://academy.cba.mit.edu/classes/scanning_printing/index.html
● We uploaded the downloaded file.
● We pressed flatten so the object sits flat on the bed.
● We selected the material: PLA.
● We verified the scale: Z axis 2 cm, Y axis 1.5 cm, Z axis 2 cm.
● We enabled supports.
● We clicked slice and saw the print time: 16 min, then saved the file as gcode.
● We loaded the gcode to the 3D printer.
● We repeated the same process with the other files.

Image 56 placeholder
Image 56
Image 57 placeholder
Image 57
Image 58 placeholder
Image 58

● When printing, keep in mind: heat the bed to around 60 °C.
● Heat the extruder to around 200 °C.
● Level the extruder 1 mm from the bed.
● For tall/raised shapes (e.g., a chess knight), enable supports in Cura.
● Verify you have enough PLA before printing; check in Cura how much filament will be used.

6. Rocio

The 3D printer used this week was a Bambu Lab A1, designed for fast and precise prototyping. One of its main advantages is the automatic calibration system, which includes bed leveling, vibration compensation, and material flow control.

Bambu Lab A1 — Specs (as documented)
ModelBambu Lab A1
TechnologyFDM (Fused Deposition Modeling)
Print volume256 × 256 × 256 mm
Filament / Nozzle diameter1.75 mm / 0.4 mm
Compatible materialsPLA, PETG, TPU, ABS, ASA
Max nozzle / bed temp300 °C / 100 °C
Max speedUp to 500 mm/s
Layer height0.08 – 0.28 mm
Approx. accuracy±0.1 mm
Compatible softwareBambu Studio, OrcaSlicer, Wi-Fi, USB
Input voltage100–240 V AC
Approx. weight8.3 kg
Image 60 placeholder
Image 60

The software used to prepare print files was Bambu Studio, the official Bambu Lab slicer. This program converts 3D models into instructions the printer can interpret, generating the necessary G-code. In Bambu Studio, I configured key parameters such as layer height, print speed, extruder and bed temperature, infill type, and supports. I also used the preview to verify toolpaths, estimated times, and potential errors before printing.

Image 61 placeholder
Image 61

After importing the test files into the workspace, I configured print parameters according to the material used. In this case, for eSUN PLA I set the nozzle temperature to 220 °C and the heated bed to 65 °C. Once defined, I used “Slice Plate” to generate the G-code and check the print preview.

Image 62 placeholder
Image 62
Image 63 placeholder
Image 63
Image 64 placeholder
Image 64
Image 65 placeholder
Image 65

Overhang test

The printed parts showed very good overall quality. Supports were generated correctly and were easy to remove, leaving only small marks on contact surfaces. Overhang areas were printed with good definition and bridges remained stable without excessive drooping. Layer adhesion was uniform and dimensional accuracy was acceptable for prototyping.

Image 66 placeholder
Image 66

In this test, I learned that correct support configuration is essential to avoid deformation in complex geometries. I also confirmed that the Bambu Lab A1 handles supported structures very well, producing clean surfaces and reliable results.

Angle test

To evaluate the overhang capability of the Bambu Lab A1, I printed an angle test model with different inclinations, from 90° to 10°. This test helps determine the maximum angle that can be printed without supports while maintaining good surface quality.

Results showed the printer produced very clean surfaces down to approximately 20° without needing supports. At angles below 20°, small defects began to appear, such as rough surfaces and slight sagging, indicating the limitations of support-free printing.

Image 67 placeholder
Image 67
Image 68 placeholder
Image 68

This test helped me understand the importance of part orientation during slicing. Knowing the printer performs well down to about 20° helps me design parts that minimize supports, improving surface finish and reducing material waste.

Tolerance test — clearance characterization

To evaluate dimensional precision, I printed a tolerance model with different clearances from 1.0 mm to 0.1 mm. This helps determine the minimum separation needed between moving or interlocking parts so they work without binding.

Results showed pieces with clearances of 0.2 mm or more moved freely, while smaller clearances began to stick or fuse. This indicates that, for my printer settings and material, a clearance of around 0.2 mm is recommended for moving parts or assemblies.

Image 69 placeholder
Image 69
Image 70 placeholder
Image 70

This test helped me understand how printer calibration, material shrinkage, and slicing parameters affect dimensional accuracy. Knowing the correct tolerance allows me to design functional parts that fit properly without sanding or heavy post-processing.

Tolerance (press-fit) test

To evaluate dimensional accuracy, I performed a press-fit tolerance test using a model with numbered slots of different thicknesses. This type of test identifies the minimum clearance needed for a correct fit between 3D printed parts. It was observed that when pressing pieces into the slots, some broke due to insufficient tolerance, while others resisted without damage. The pieces that did not break indicate the correct tolerance for a functional fit in this material and print configuration.

Image 71 placeholder
Image 71
Image 72 placeholder
Image 72

This result demonstrates the importance of considering clearance in 3D print designs, because small variations in tenths of a millimeter can determine whether an assembly works or fails.

Infill test

To evaluate how infill percentage influences strength and finish, tests were run using different infill configurations in Bambu Studio. Three samples were printed with 15%, 50%, and 100% infill, keeping other parameters constant (temperature, speed, and layer height).

Image 73 placeholder
Image 73
Image 74 placeholder
Image 74

During configuration, a grid infill pattern was selected to clearly observe internal structure. At 15%, the part was lightweight with lower material usage but reduced rigidity. At 50%, the part had a good balance between strength and weight with a stable internal structure. At 100%, the part was fully solid with the highest rigidity, but also increased print time and material consumption.

Comparison Between Printers (Summary)

Printer Build Volume Slicer Key Strengths Observed
Artillery Genius Pro 220 × 220 × 250 mm Ultimaker Cura 5.5.0 Good learning platform for calibration; print quality improves strongly with tuning (temperature, retraction, flow).
Creality K1 SE 220 × 220 × 250 mm Creality Print CoreXY for high speed/precision; supports strategy affects cleanup; best clearances (in this test) from 1.0 to 0.4.
Bambu Lab A1 256 × 256 × 256 mm Bambu Studio Very strong automation and consistency; clean results, supports easy to remove; good performance around ~20° without supports in the angle test.
Prusa XL 360 × 360 × 360 mm PrusaSlicer / OrcaSlicer Large volume; multi-toolhead workflow supports multi-material/multi-color; structured process for retraction/temperature/tolerance tuning.
Bestgee T300S Pro Not specified in the notes Ultimaker Cura Emphasis on fundamentals: temperatures, leveling, supports, and verifying filament consumption before printing.

Final Reflection (Group)

This group assignment helped me understand that 3D printing “rules” are not just theory—they are measurable limits that depend on the printer, the slicer, and the exact configuration used. By comparing multiple machines, it became clear that calibration and workflow decisions (orientation, supports, layer height, cooling, and infill) can be just as important as the hardware itself. The tests made it easier to justify design decisions using evidence: knowing when supports are truly required, what overhang angles remain clean, and what tolerance values enable functional movement or press-fit assemblies. Overall, this week reinforced a key lesson: successful 3D printing is a controlled process of iteration—test, adjust, print again—until the results match the design intent.

II) Individual assignments:

  • Design, document and 3D print an object (small, few cm3, limited by printer time) that could not be easily made subtractively

For my individual work, I designed and printed a small geometric sphere composed of an open reticular structure. This object could not be easily manufactured subtractively, since it contains numerous internal connections and bars that intersect inside a closed spherical form. The sphere was designed in Fusion with a diameter of approximately 25 cm and thin structural elements of about 5 mm thickness. Despite its lightweight structure, the part turned out to be surprisingly strong and stable. The objective of this design was to explore complex geometries that are only possible through additive manufacturing, demonstrating how 3D printing allows the creation of organic and intricate structures that cannot be machined using traditional subtractive methods.

2. Step-by-step design process

Step 1: Conceptual idea

I wanted to create an object that showed the advantages of 3D printing over subtractive manufacturing. And to be more sure, I asked CHAT GTP for suggestions and it gave me these suggestions:

Img 75
Img 75

And although it gave me several options, I was inspired by textures and chose a reticular sphere because its internal geometry cannot be drilled or milled.

Step 2: Modeling in Fusion

I opened Fusion 360 and created a new file, verified that I was working in the Design workspace, went to Create and chose the option to generate a sphere: Sphere / Revolve / Form) and defined the sphere diameter at 250 mm so that the texture to be created could be more striking, since with less it makes the lines very thick, but then it can be scaled when sending it to print; I set it to 7 cm diameter so it would be fast to print.

Img 76
Img 76

Then I converted the sphere into a non-subtractive design, activated the modeling area where I could transform the geometry into an open structure (mesh-like) and then I began to create the network (pattern) over the surface of the sphere, generating connections between points/segments to form “nodes” and “branches”. I looked for that form because, having a geometry with holes in all directions, it is not easy to do by subtraction.

Img 77
Img 77
Img 78
Img 78
Img 79
Img 79
Img 80
Img 80
Img 81
Img 81
Img 82
Img 82

Once the mesh was defined, I applied a thickness of 5 mm to the “threads”/branches, adjusted the thickness so that it would be printable without complicated supports and not break easily, and finally I checked that there were no “loose” parts or disconnected segments.

Img 83
Img 83
Img 84
Img 84
Img 85
Img 85
Img 86
Img 86

Then I exported the file as STL: File > Export (or right-click the body > Save as mesh).

Img 87
Img 87
Img 88
Img 88

Then I imported the STL file into Bambu Studio, oriented and scaled the model, set it to 7 cm diameter and configured the parameters to minimize supports for printing: (Material: PLA, Nozzle temperature: 220 °C, Bed temperature: 65 °C, Layer height: 0.2 mm, Infill: 15%, I previewed the layers and generated the G-code.

Img 89
Img 89
Img 90
Img 90
Img 91
Img 91
Img 92
Img 92
Img 93
Img 93
Img 94
Img 94
Img 95
Img 95
Img 96
Img 96
Img 97
Img 97

I sent the file to the Bambu Lab A1 printer and started printing, the printing process took 1:30 hours.

Video 1

The sphere printed correctly without supports. Even with thin 5 mm rods, the structure turned out to be strong and rigid. This sphere contains an organic reticular structure; these characteristics cannot be created by CNC milling or drilling because the tools cannot access the interior without breaking the object. Additive manufacturing builds the object layer by layer, which allows these complex geometries.

Design reflection

This design was ideal for the week’s assignment because it could not be easily manufactured by subtractive methods: the sphere has a network-like structure with voids in all directions and internal geometry that would be impossible to carve or mill without destroying the part. I chose a 5 mm thickness to maintain a balance between lightness and strength. The most interesting part was confirming that, despite being an open structure, the piece turned out to be surprisingly strong, demonstrating how 3D printing allows creating complex and functional forms using less material. This task taught me that 3D printing is not only about reproducing shapes, but about designing intelligently for additive manufacturing. It allows us to create lightweight, strong, and complex objects that would be impossible with traditional manufacturing methods.

• 3D scan an object (and optionally print it)

1) Scanner description and technical specifications

For the 3D scan I used the Matter and Form 3D Scanner V2, a desktop scanner intended to digitize small/medium objects using laser + camera and a rotating base. The workflow is done with the MFStudio software, where a project is created, the equipment is calibrated, and scan passes are executed (with or without texture).

Main technical specifications:

  • Type: desktop 3D scanner with turntable (rotating base).
  • Geometry capture:
    • Regular Scan: uses two lasers (10–15 min per pass) and allows optional texture.
    • Quickscan: uses one laser (1–2 min per pass) for fast scanning (with differences in coverage/precision depending on the chosen laser).
  • Recommended maximum object area/size: approx. 180 mm tall and 250 mm diameter (according to the product sheet).
  • Resolution / accuracy (manufacturer / datasheet reference): approx. 0.1 mm (according to the product sheet).

Software (MFStudio) — download

The manual indicates the official MFStudio download site here: https://www.matterandform.net/download

Img 98
Img 98
Img 99
Img 99

2) Scanned object

I scanned a dinosaur toy approximately 11 cm tall and 13 cm wide including the tail. I chose this object because it has organic shapes, small details, and worn areas that help evaluate how well detail is recovered under real conditions.

To improve model coverage, I scanned it in 3 positions:

  1. Standing
  2. Lying down
  3. Upside down (head down)

In addition, I did not scan color/contrast (texture) because that option took longer and my priority was to obtain the geometry in less time.

Img 100
Img 100

3) Step-by-step — calibration and scanning in MFStudio

A. Area preparation and connection

  1. I chose a stable, level table with uniform ambient light (no strong shadows).
  2. I connected the scanner to the computer via USB and then connected the power cable.
  3. I opened the scanner and turned it on (button with the “MF” logo).
  4. I opened MFStudio and waited for it to detect the scanner.
Img 101
Img 101

B. Calibration (required before the first scan)

The manual indicates that before the first scan you must calibrate, and it also recommends recalibrating if the scanner is moved or if lighting changes significantly.

  1. In MFStudio I went to File → Calibrate.
  2. I selected the calibration device (card or box) that comes with the scanner and followed the instructions to assemble it if needed.
  3. I followed the calibration steps Step 1 and Step 2 inside the software.
  4. During calibration, I did not move either the scanner or the card/box; the table rotates, the lasers activate, and the program compares data (Step 2 usually takes longer).
  5. If an error appeared, I checked lighting and settings before repeating the calibration.
Img 102
Img 102
Img 103
Img 103
Img 104
Img 104
Img 105
Img 105
Img 106
Img 106

C. Create a project and configure the scan

  1. In MFStudio I selected New Project, assigned a name, and saved the project file.
  2. I pressed +new scan to start a scan.
  3. I chose the scan mode:
    • Regular Scan (more detailed; 10–15 min per pass; uses 2 lasers; optional texture).
    • (I avoided Quickscan for this work because I wanted better geometry quality.)
Img 107
Img 107

D. Scanning in 3 positions (to capture the shape better)

  1. Position 1: dinosaur standing
  2. Position 2: dinosaur lying down
  3. Position 3: dinosaur upside down (head down)
  4. I created the mesh
Img 108
Img 108
Img 109
Img 109

E. Time and selected quality

  • For the scan to be very precise, the process can take much more time (in my case I estimated it could reach ~5 hours with a more demanding setup and/or more passes).
  • For that reason I performed a medium-quality scan, which lasted approximately 1 hour in total (considering the 3 positions and the workflow).

F. Results and issues found

  • The medium-quality scan was enough to capture the overall shape of the dinosaur.
  • However, because the toy had worn areas, some details did not come out well, especially on one arm and one leg, where the model lost definition.
  • I also avoided texture/color because it increased the time.
Img 110
Img 110
Img 111
Img 114
Video 2

Final reflection — Week 5 (3D Scanning and Printing)

This week helped me understand that final quality depends more on the process and decisions than only on “having a machine”. In 3D printing I learned to justify parameters such as tolerances, supports, angles, and infill based on tests. And with 3D scanning I confirmed that “capturing well” requires patience and strategy: calibrating correctly, controlling lighting, and above all planning multiple positions to cover hidden areas.

The most important part was comparing time vs results: a very detailed scan can take hours, so choosing medium quality (1 hour) was a realistic decision to move forward, even while accepting limitations (loss of detail in worn parts). Overall, week 5 left me with a clear idea: both in printing and scanning, success is about iterating, measuring, correcting, and documenting to improve the next attempt.