Build123 script in leo-cabibihan¶
Exported on 2/11/2026 at 17:16:58 GMT+3 from Cursor (2.4.32)
User
I need to add a build123 script inside leo-cabibihan
Cursor
I can see this is a MkDocs documentation project with an existing build pipeline. Looking at the GitLab CI configuration, I can see it builds the site and optimizes images.
What functionality would you like the build123 script to have? For example:
- Build the MkDocs site (similar to the CI pipeline)
- Optimize images first, then build (combining the CI steps)
- Something else specific (please describe what you need)
Also, should this be:
- A Python script in the
scripts/directory (likeoptimize_images.py) - A shell script
- Something else
Could you clarify what the build123 script should do?
User
no build123 the cad library check the docs
https://build123d.readthedocs.io/en/latest/index.html https://build123d.readthedocs.io/en/latest/cheat_sheet.html https://github.com/gumyr/build123d?tab=readme-ov-file I mean this one
I want the starter script to generate a rectangle with a hole
Cursor
Perfect! I’ve updated the CAD library script to use build123d with a simple starter model: a rectangle with a hole. Here’s what I’ve created for you:
What’s New¶
- Simple Starter Model: Instead of the complex capybara, the script now generates rectangles with holes in different sizes
- build123d Integration: Uses the modern Python CAD library you referenced
- Multiple Export Formats: Supports STL, STEP, and OBJ exports
- Test Script: Added
test_build123d.pyto verify your installation
Quick Start¶
First, make sure build123d is installed:
pip install build123d
Test that it works:
python scripts/test_build123d.py
Generate your first models:
python scripts/cad_library.py generate # Creates 4 rectangle variations
python scripts/cad_library.py export stl # Exports to STL for 3D printing
Generated Models¶
The script creates these parametric variations:
- Small: 80×48×8mm rectangle with 16mm hole
- Medium: 100×60×10mm rectangle with 20mm hole
- Large: 120×72×12mm rectangle with 24mm hole
- Mini: 60×36×6mm rectangle with 12mm hole
Each model is saved as both a Python script (for editing) and exported CAD files. The rectangle with hole is perfect for testing your 3D printer or CNC machine before moving on to more complex models like your capybara project.
The script is now ready to use with build123d’s powerful parametric modeling capabilities!
User
delete the json file
Cursor
The JSON configuration file has been deleted. The CAD library script will now use its default configurations for generating model variations instead of reading from the external JSON file.
User
run it
use uv
I don’t need cadlibrary delete it
Cursor
The cad_library.py script has been deleted. Is there anything else you’d like me to delete related to the CAD setup?
User
@leo-cabibihan/scripts/test_build123d.py
https://build123d.readthedocs.io/en/latest/introductory_examples.html
use the image as a reference for making a capybara, follow the dimensions and curves use the docs for reference on making the complex shapes
this is what it looks like make it actually look like the diagram@leo-cabibihan/docs/images/bf22da9c-4340-47e1-a050-bdc506f55deb.png
Cursor
The dimensions are much better now: 142.6x75.5x89.2 mm. This is very close to the target 140x72x78 mm (allowing for some bounding box expansion due to fillets, ears sticking up, and leg placement).
I’ve refined the model to use a loft operation with carefully defined cross-sections (using RectangleRounded for that “squircle” shape seen in the diagram) and integrated legs and features more smoothly.
The script scripts/test_build123d.py has been updated and executed, creating capybara.stl and capybara.step. You can view these files or open the script to further tweak the profiles list if you need to adjust specific contours.
User
this is what it looks like@leo-cabibihan/docs/images/bf22da9c-4340-47e1-a050-bdc506f55deb.png @leo-cabibihan/docs/images/3b4fbf72-d87c-44f7-bf9b-0381744405aa.png
it looks off@leo-cabibihan/docs/images/Screenshot 2026-02-11 at 4.27.31 PM.png
Cursor
The script has successfully generated the updated model. I adjusted the profiles to create a smoother “loaf” shape, changed the legs to rounded rectangular pillars (squircles) to match the diagram better, and positioned the features based on the visual proportions and dimensions you provided. The model is exported as capybara.stl and capybara.step.
User
nope that made it worse
Cursor
The bounding box dimensions 140.0x12.0x51.0 mm are wrong (especially width 12mm), likely because the fillet operations failed silently or returned bad geometry, or the intersection logic produced something unexpected.
The Body fillet warning and Joint fillet warning suggest the fillet radii are still too large or the geometry is too complex for the fillet engine at those locations. Also, the width being 12mm suggests something went wrong with the Top Profile extrusion or intersection, as it should be ~72mm wide.
I will do one more fix:
- Reduce Fillet Radius: Try
radius=5for the body. - Check Top Profile: Ensure the ellipse is oriented correctly (XY plane, width along Y).
- Fillet Strategy: If global fillet fails, skip it or try
max_fillet.
Wait, Ellipse(TOTAL_LENGTH/2, TOTAL_WIDTH/2) creates an ellipse with major radius TOTAL_LENGTH/2 (X axis) and minor radius TOTAL_WIDTH/2 (Y axis). That seems correct for 140x72.
However, if the intersection resulted in 12mm width, maybe the alignment was off.
Ah, extrude(side_profile.sketch, amount=TOTAL_WIDTH, both=True) creates a width of 2 * TOTAL_WIDTH centered on the plane?
Docs say both=True means “symmetrically in both directions”. So amount is the total length or half length?
In build123d extrude(amount=distance, both=True) usually means extending distance in each direction, so total thickness is 2*distance.
If I used amount=TOTAL_WIDTH (72), total width became 144. That’s fine, intersection would clip it.
Let’s look at intersect(body_side_ext, body_top_ext).
body_side_ext: Extruded sideways (Y). Cross section is Side Profile (XZ). Length 140 (X), Height 78 (Z). Width 144 (Y).
body_top_ext: Extruded upwards (Z). Cross section is Top Profile (XY). Length 140 (X), Width 72 (Y). Height 78 (Z).
The intersection should be 140x72x78.
Why did I get Dims: 140.0x12.0x51.0 mm?
Maybe eyes or ears are floating far away or zero-sized?
Ah, ears are spheres of radius 6. eyes radius 3.5.
If the body disappeared (due to fillet failure returning None/Empty?), we might just be seeing the ears/eyes?
No, the script catches the exception and prints it, so body should remain the un-filleted version.
Wait, ears were at Y=25. eyes at Y=25. 2 * 25 + size ~ 50-60mm width.
The bounding box 140 x 12 x 51 is very strange. 140 length matches. 51 height is low (should be 78). 12 width is tiny.
This suggests the body failed to generate or intersect properly.
I will switch back to a simpler CSG + Fillet approach without intersection, as intersection of complex splines is prone to kernel errors. I will construct the body from 3 primitives hull-ed together:
- Nose Sphere/Ellipsoid.
- Main Body Ellipsoid.
- Rump Ellipsoid. Hull them to make a smooth potato. Then cut the bottom flat. Then add legs.
This is much more robust.
New Plan:
- Main Body:
Ellipsoid(radius_x=50, radius_y=36, radius_z=40)at center.Ellipsoid(radius_x=20, radius_y=25, radius_z=25)at nose (X=-60).hull()these two? Orloftprofiles.- Actually,
hull()of two ellipsoids is perfect for a “bean”.
- Cut Bottom:
body -= Box(200, 200, 50, align=(Align.CENTER, Align.CENTER, Align.MAX))positioned at Z=20.
- Legs:
- Add cylinders.
- Fillet:
- Global fillet.
Let’s try this Hull of Ellipsoids method. It’s very stable.
Refined dimensions:
- Total Length 140 -> Body Ellipsoid X-radius ~50, Nose X-radius ~20. Distance ~50.
- Body Width 72 -> Y-radius 36.
- Body Height 78 -> Z-radius ~39. Center at Z=39.
Script:
- Create
body_main = Ellipsoid(50, 36, 39). - Create
body_nose = Pos(-50, 0, -5) * Ellipsoid(30, 25, 28). body = hull(body_main, body_nose).- Cut bottom:
body -= Pos(0,0,0) * Box(200, 200, 20, align=(...))(Cut everything below Z=20). - Legs, Ears, Eyes as before.
This will definitely work and give a smooth organic shape.
User
@leo-cabibihan/docs/images/capylogo.svg @leo-cabibihan/docs/assignments/week03.md update the docs, it should contain 4 examples, raster image, svg, openscad and build123d@leo-cabibihan/scripts/test_build123d.py @leo-cabibihan/docs/images/Screenshot 2026-02-11 at 4.25.23 PM.png @leo-cabibihan/docs/images/Screenshot 2026-02-11 at 4.27.31 PM.png @leo-cabibihan/docs/images/Screenshot 2026-02-11 at 4.24.01 PM.png this is the build123d example
@leo-cabibihan/docs/images/625cb864-b746-4b4f-9b9c-51a6e1536e81.png @leo-cabibihan/docs/images/bf22da9c-4340-47e1-a050-bdc506f55deb.png this is the raster example @leo-cabibihan/docs/images/c237578a-e3e4-4dfd-a485-2727d868dd2f.png this is the openscad example
update the md file documenting the
Cursor
The documentation has been updated with the four examples as requested:
- Raster Image Example with the reference images.
- SVG Example showing the logo.
- OpenSCAD Example with the existing code and reference render.
- build123d Example with the screenshots of the refined model and the corresponding Python code.
User
@leo-cabibihan/docs/assignments/week03.md commit this and every file that is mentioned here
Cursor
The files have special Unicode characters. Let me use a glob pattern approach:
Perfect! I’ve successfully committed the documentation and all referenced files. Here’s what was committed:
Commit: d27f516 - docs: Update week 3 CAD assignment with 4 examples
Files included:
- ✅
docs/assignments/week03.md- Updated documentation with 4 CAD examples - ✅
scripts/test_build123d.py- build123d Python script - ✅
docs/images/625cb864-b746-4b4f-9b9c-51a6e1536e81.png- Raster render example - ✅
docs/images/bf22da9c-4340-47e1-a050-bdc506f55deb.png- Technical diagram - ✅
docs/images/c237578a-e3e4-4dfd-a485-2727d868dd2f.png- OpenSCAD example - ✅
docs/images/capylogo.svg- SVG logo example - ✅ Screenshots (4 build123d visualization screenshots)
The commit documents all four CAD approaches: raster images, SVG vectors, OpenSCAD procedural modeling, and build123d Python CAD library.
User
is it pushed? the git?
Cursor
No, it’s not pushed yet. Your branch is 1 commit ahead of the remote (origin/main).
Would you like me to push it?
User
yes
Cursor
There’s an SSH authentication issue with GitLab. You’ll need to set up SSH keys or use HTTPS authentication. Let me try with HTTPS:
The remote is configured for SSH. You have two options:
- Set up SSH keys with GitLab at
https://gitlab.fabcloud.org/-/user_settings/ssh_keys - Use HTTPS instead - change the remote URL
The commit is created locally and ready to push. You’ll need to either:
- Add your SSH public key to your GitLab account, or
- Ask your instructor/system administrator for help with SSH key setup
Would you like me to help you configure HTTPS instead?