...

Group Assignment 13

Group 1

Group 1

Evelyn Cuadrado

Jhonatan Cortes

For the group assignment, we met to organize ourselves and review the progress each member has made so far. Below is the information related to the group project.



An important aspect to consider when doing this assignment is the use of personal protective equipment, since it involves working with materials that contain chemicals potentially harmful to health. The smell of the catalyst, both in silicone and resin, is quite strong. Even though silicone smells somewhat like rubber, it can still pose health risks if inhaled for extended periods. Therefore, it's essential to protect yourself by using a mask, latex gloves, and safety glasses.



Materials

For this assignment, molding and casting materials will be used, excluding F-20 Plus silicone and polyester resin, each with its respective catalyst.



1. F-20 Plus silicone + catalyst

Silicone Type: RTV (Room Temperature Vulcanizing)
Vulcanizes at room temperature. Suitable for use as a flexible mold.
Features
Medium hardness and viscosity Makes it versatile for various applications in industry and art.
High tear resistance Durable for repeated use and fine detail capturing.
Suitable for casting and brush-on techniques Can be applied by pouring or with a brush, depending on the need.
Available Sizes
1 kg container Small projects and testing purposes.
5 kg bucket Medium-scale productions.
20 kg bucket Large-scale or industrial applications.

I will be using this material primarily to create a negative, as it will serve as a flexible mold. Below, I will provide a general data sheet for the product, since there is no detailed information available online, either from the brand or in general.

This type of silicone is specially designed for creating high-quality molds of all kinds, as it is a general-purpose silicone. It is suitable for reproducing pieces in resin, plaster, polyurethanes, waxes, costume jewelry, cold ceramics, etc.




2. F-Plus Silicone Catalyst - Technical Data Sheet

Product Description
The F-Plus Catalyst is an additive specifically formulated for the vulcanization of RTV (Room Temperature Vulcanizing) silicones. It is used in combination with F-Plus silicone to create high-quality flexible molds, suitable for various applications in industry and the arts.
Key Features
Mixing Ratio 2% - 3% catalyst by weight of silicone
Form Transparent or slightly opaque liquid
Curing Time Depending on the amount of catalyst used, curing can range from 30 minutes to 24 hours
Ease of Use Easy to dose with a syringe for accurate measurement
Instructions for Use
  1. Mixing: Add between 2 and 3 grams of catalyst per 100 grams of F-Plus silicone.
  2. Mix thoroughly: Ensure the catalyst is completely blended with the silicone for proper vulcanization.
  3. Application: Use the mixture in the pouring process or brush-on method on the object to be replicated.
  4. Curing: Allow curing at room temperature for the specified time (depending on the amount of catalyst used).
Catalyst Properties
Adjustable curing speed Using more catalyst will speed up curing, while using less will slow down the curing time.
Versatility Suitable for all types of molds, including those used for casting pieces in resin, plaster, polyurethane, wax, jewelry, ceramics, and more.
Compatibility Compatible with other F-Plus silicones and similar-quality RTV products.
Usage Precautions
  • Avoid direct contact: Do not allow the catalyst to come into direct contact with skin or eyes.
  • Storage: Keep the catalyst in its original container, in a cool, dry place, away from heat sources.
  • Safety: Wear gloves and safety goggles during handling to avoid irritation.
Benefits
  • Curing time control: Allows adjustment of the curing speed based on project needs.
  • High-quality molds: Proper use of the catalyst ensures molds with excellent tear resistance, flexibility, and precision.
  • Easy to measure: The catalyst formula is designed for easy measurement, ensuring a perfect mix every time.
Available Sizes
100 ml container For small projects
500 ml container For medium-sized projects
1 liter container For larger projects or industrial use


Important Note:

It is recommended to use a scale to weigh the silicone and a syringe to measure the catalyst in order to ensure precise mixing.



Silikast-Pro Polyester Resin Technical Data Sheet

The resin will be used for casting applications.(This information was sourced from ChatGPT.)

Product Description
Silikast-Pro is a high-quality unsaturated polyester resin designed for general molding, laminating, and other applications that require good mechanical and thermal resistance. It is ideal for mold manufacturing, automotive parts, repairs, and various applications in industrial and artistic fields.
Key Features
Type Unsaturated Polyester Resin
Color Transparent or slightly yellowish
Composition Polyester base + Styrene monomer
Working Time (Pot Life) 15–30 minutes, depending on ambient temperature and catalyst amount
Curing Time 30 minutes to 1 hour (full curing may take up to 24 hours depending on the thickness of the piece)
Density 1.1 – 1.2 g/cm³
Viscosity 2000 – 3000 cps (depending on temperature and formulation)
Curing Properties Requires a catalyst (Methyl Ethyl Ketone Peroxide, MEKP) to initiate the curing process
Instructions for Use
  1. Mixing: The resin should be mixed with the catalyst in a typical ratio of 100 parts of resin to 1-2 parts of catalyst (depending on the manufacturer's instructions).
  2. Application: Apply the resin through pouring or laminating onto the mold or object to be fabricated. It can be used with fiberglass or directly on the desired surface.
  3. Curing: Allow curing at room temperature (18–25°C) for the specified time.
  4. Recommendation: It is important to test the mixing ratios and working time to determine the exact catalyst proportions depending on ambient temperature.
Mechanical Properties
Tensile Strength 60 – 80 MPa
Flexural Strength 85 – 95 MPa
Impact Resistance 10 – 15 kJ/m²
Modulus of Elasticity 3.5 – 4.5 GPa
Thermal Properties
Heat Distortion Temperature 80 – 90°C
Coefficient of Thermal Expansion 50 – 60 x 10^-6 /°C
Applications
  • Mold Manufacturing: For producing resin, plaster, cement, and other material castings.
  • Automotive Industry: Repairing parts or manufacturing components.
  • Surface Repairs: For fiberglass, wood, metal, etc.
  • Artistic Manufacturing: Sculptures, decorative pieces, etc.
  • Fiberglass Laminating: For structures and coatings.
Usage Precautions
  • Avoid direct contact: Do not allow the resin to come into direct contact with skin or eyes. Wear gloves, goggles, and appropriate clothing.
  • Ventilation: Use in well-ventilated areas due to fumes released during curing.
  • Storage: Store the resin in its original container, tightly closed, in a cool, dry place, away from heat sources and direct light.
Available Sizes
1 kg container Ideal for small projects
5 kg container For medium-sized projects
20 kg container For industrial use or large-scale projects

Important Note:

The characteristics of the resin may vary depending on the type of catalyst and mixing conditions. It is recommended to conduct tests before large-scale production.

Polyester Resin Catalyst Technical Data Sheet

Product Description
The Polyester Resin Catalyst is a compound that, when mixed with the resin, initiates the curing (vulcanization) process of the polyester resin. This catalyst is essential for ensuring that the resin hardens and acquires the desired mechanical and thermal properties.
Catalyst Usage Method
Mixing Ratio Add between 1.5% and 2% catalyst to the total amount of resin, or 10 to 20 drops per 100 grams of Silikast-Pro resin.
Mixing After adding the catalyst to the resin, mix thoroughly for at least 1 minute to ensure the mixture is homogeneous.
Instructions for Use
  1. Measure the desired amount of resin.
  2. Add 10 to 20 drops of catalyst per 100 grams of resin (approximately 1.5% - 2% of the total amount).
  3. Mix the resin and catalyst thoroughly for 1 minute to ensure a homogeneous mixture.
  4. Once mixed, proceed with the application of the resin for molds, laminating, or other desired applications.
Usage Precautions
  • Avoid direct contact: Avoid contact with skin and eyes. Wear gloves and protective goggles when handling.
  • Ventilation: Use in a well-ventilated area to avoid inhaling fumes.
  • Storage: Store the catalyst in its original container, in a cool, dry place, away from heat sources and direct sunlight.
Available Sizes
50 ml bottles Ideal for small projects
100 ml bottles For medium-sized projects



Conduct and compare molding tests.

For this assignment, I created a mold using 3D printing, which will be one of the test molds. For the second mold, I made a positive design, from which I will obtain the negative part using silicone.



Visual Comparison of Molds
Feature 3D Printed Mold Silicone Mold
Detail Precision High High
Mold Surface Smooth Variable
Fabrication Time Long Moderate
Reusability Low High
Cost Moderate Low
Ease of Demolding High High

Both molding methods have advantages and disadvantages depending on the type of project and the resources available. The 3D printed mold is ideal for quick prototypes and complex designs, while the silicone mold offers flexibility and durability for longer production runs. The choice between one or the other will depend on factors such as available time, budget, and the nature of the final product.



Comparison of Molds: 3D Printing vs CNC Milling

The following table provides a comparison between the molding methods using 3D printing and CNC milling, based on the process, production time, cost, precision, and recommended applications.

Aspect 3D Printing CNC Milling
Manufacturing Process Uses a 3D printer to create the mold from an STL file. Direct process without additional tools. Uses a CNC machine to mill the mold from a material block. Requires programming and tool selection.
Production Time The estimated time for printing is approximately 4 hours and 56 minutes. Time varies depending on design complexity, but is generally longer due to the machining process.
Cost Low initial costs, ideal for prototypes and small-scale productions. Higher initial costs due to the need for specialized tools. More cost-effective for mass production.
Precision and Surface Finish May show visible layer lines affecting the surface finish, but post-processing can smooth the mold. Offers a smoother and more precise surface finish, especially with materials like aluminum.
Design Flexibility Allows for complex geometries and customized designs without significant limitations. Limited by tools and material geometry, which can restrict complex designs.
Recommended Applications Ideal for rapid prototyping, low-volume productions, and custom designs. Best suited for mass production, durable molds, and when high precision is required.

Conclusion:

The choice between 3D printing and CNC milling depends on the specific needs of the project. 3D printing is ideal for rapid prototyping and small-scale productions, while CNC milling is better for large-scale productions requiring high precision and durability.




Group 2

Andrés Felipe Guarnizo Saavedra

Michael Sebastián Torres Garzón

This week involved creating molds using two different techniques. First, a rigid mold was fabricated through 3D printing, providing a solid and detailed base. Simultaneously, another mold was made using CNC routing on a suitable material, which was carefully cleaned after cutting to ensure quality. Silicone platinum was then poured over this rigid mold to create a flexible and elastic mold, ideal for accurately reproducing parts and facilitating demolding without damaging the original object.

This process combined digital technologies and advanced materials to explore different molding and casting methods, emphasizing the importance of precision, flexibility, and safety in material handling.

Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)

To ensure safety during the handling of platinum silicone and other materials used in mold making, the following personal protective equipment was used:

These measures help minimize risks and ensure a safe environment during the molding and casting process.

Datasheet Explanation for BBDINO Super Elastic Silicone Mold Making Rubber Platinum

Datasheet: BBDINO Super Elastic Silicone Mold Making Rubber Platinum

Download the datasheet to learn more about specifications and safe usage.

Download Datasheet (PDF)

The material used to create the flexible mold is a highly elastic and high-precision platinum silicone. According to its safety datasheet, this silicone has the following key characteristics:

These properties make this silicone suitable for manufacturing high-quality flexible molds that can be reused in multiple production cycles without losing detail or durability.

Procedure for Using BBDINO Super Elastic Silicone Mold Making Rubber Platinum

  1. Preparation of the rigid base mold:
    Before pouring the silicone, the rigid mold (obtained by 3D printing or CNC routing) must be completely clean and free of dust, grease, or residues. This ensures good adhesion and avoids imperfections in the final mold.
  2. Measuring and mixing the silicone:
    The silicone usually comes as two components (base and catalyst) that must be mixed in a 1:1 ratio by volume or weight, as specified by the manufacturer. Accurate measurement is crucial to ensure proper curing.
  3. Homogeneous mixing:
    Mix slowly and thoroughly to avoid air bubbles that can affect the mold's surface quality. In some cases, a vacuum degassing system can be used to remove bubbles.
  4. Pouring over the rigid mold:
    Pour the mixed silicone slowly onto the rigid mold, starting from one edge to allow the material to flow and cover the entire surface without trapping air.
  5. Curing:
    Allow the silicone to cure at room temperature for the recommended time (8–12 hours) or accelerate the process by applying controlled heat (up to 50°C). Time and temperature must be respected to ensure optimal properties.
  6. Demolding:
    Once fully cured, carefully remove the silicone from the rigid mold, obtaining a flexible and elastic mold that faithfully reproduces the original details.
  7. Cleaning and storage:
    Clean the flexible mold if necessary and store it in a cool, dry place to preserve its properties and extend its useful life.

Safety Recommendations During Use

Results

Photo

Video

Datasheet Explanation for PLA Used in 3D Printing

The rigid mold produced by 3D printing was made using PLA (Polylactic Acid), a common thermoplastic polymer used in additive manufacturing. According to typical PLA datasheets, this material has the following properties:

These characteristics make PLA an ideal material for producing rigid molds via 3D printing, offering dimensional accuracy and ease of post-processing.

Results

Photos

Michael's mold

Andres's mold

Comparison Between the 3D Printed PLA Mold and the Silicone Flexible Mold

Aspect 3D Printed PLA Mold Silicone Flexible Mold (BBDINO Platinum)
Material Type Rigid thermoplastic (Polylactic Acid) Flexible platinum-cured silicone rubber
Flexibility Rigid, limited to no flexibility Highly elastic and flexible
Durability Good structural stability but prone to cracking under stress Excellent durability, withstands multiple demolding cycles without damage
Detail Reproduction Good surface finish, dependent on printer resolution Excellent fine detail reproduction, especially on complex geometries
Curing / Production Time Printing time varies from hours to days depending on size and settings Requires more time: design of negative mold, CNC routing, pouring silicone, and curing (~24 hours)
Heat Resistance Glass transition around 60-65°C, softens under heat Stable under higher temperatures, depending on silicone grade
Use Cases Ideal for producing rigid molds or prototypes Ideal for flexible molds, complex shapes, and delicate demolding
Safety and Environmental Impact Biodegradable and generally safe to print; requires ventilation Non-toxic once cured; requires PPE during handling liquid form
Cost Relatively low cost per mold, depending on filament and printer Material cost is higher; reusable mold reduces long-term cost

Final Results

3d Pritner mold

Flexi Mold


Group 3

Armando Calcina

For the development of this task, I met with my colleague Evelyn through Meet to compare and show her the materials we used to make the mold, we saw the characteristics and safety that we should have with each of them. In my case, I used wax as a pattern (model) inside a mold made of plaster, for the second process, 3D printing technology was used to make the negative mold, and silicone as a filler.



Every manual task involves certain risks. While they cannot be completely eliminated, it is necessary to take all possible preventive measures to minimize them. The use of appropriate safety equipment is one of the most important, especially when performing this type of work, for example, in plaster machining, which can generate dust and cause lung irritation or some type of respiratory damage.



1.-Materials

I have used two types of molds in this case Plaster and wax as filling, then I used a 3D Print as a mold with application of Silicone Filling, below is the description of each of them.



2.-Features of Wax as a Filler for Plaster Molds

In this process, wax was used as a pattern (model) inside a mold made of plaster, following the classic methodology of investment casting or lost wax, but first we will see its characteristics and then continue with the process.

A. Product Identification

Commercial name: Plaster of Paris / Ceramic plaster

Chemical name: Calcium sulfate hemihydrate (CaSO₄·½H₂O)

Recommended use: Casting molds, sculpture, crafts, casting molds, construction.

Technical Characteristics of Plaster

B.-Product Identification

Commercial name: Paraffin wax

Chemical name: Saturated hydrocarbon mixture (mainly n-alkanes)

Recommended use: Lost wax casting, modeling, candle making, and prototyping

Technical Characteristics of Wax

Procedure of CNC Machining and Wax Casting

The process began with the creation of a digital design using ArtCAM software. Once the model was finalized, the corresponding toolpaths were generated and exported as G-code for CNC machining. A block of plaster was pre-prepared by mixing and pouring it into a container, allowing it to set and dry completely. This block served as the material for subtractive manufacturing. The CNC machine precisely carved the design into the plaster. After machining, the mold was cleaned to remove any dust or residue. Paraffin was then melted and carefully poured into the machined plaster mold. Once the wax had cooled and solidified, the final step was to demold the wax piece, which accurately captured the details of the original digital model. This workflow effectively combines digital design, CNC technology, and casting techniques to produce highly detailed wax models.

To prepare plaster for casting or molding, I began by measuring the desired amount of powdered plaster and water according to the recommended mixing ratio (usually about 2 parts plaster to 1 part water, by weight). I slowly added the powdered plaster to the water, stirring continuously to prevent lumps. Mix thoroughly until you have a smooth, consistent paste. I tried to avoid overmixing to minimize air bubbles, which can weaken the final mold. Once mixed, I poured the plaster immediately into the mold or container before it begins to set. Plaster typically sets within 5 to 30 minutes, depending on the mix and the room temperature.


Preparation of Plaster mold for Machining

The video shows the preparation of plaster with water according to the indicated proportion, it dissolves so that it does not generate lumps.


The plaster milling process began with the prepared plaster block being secured to the CNC machine bed. The image shows the finished machining.


The wax casting process begins by melting the paraffin until it reaches a completely liquid state, usually between 46°C and 68°C, depending on the type of wax. Once melted, the wax is carefully poured into a prepared mold, in our case a plaster mold.


Once the wax has completely solidified inside the plaster mold, the wax model is carefully removed by peeling it away from the mold surface. This process requires caution to avoid damaging the delicate plaster mold or deforming the wax piece.


3.-Features Mold manufacturing using 3D printing and silicone

Characteristics of PLA (Polylactic Acid) for 3D Printing

Characteristics of Silicone

Our designed part turned out quite well, thanks to the elasticity of silicone, the printed molds allow for easy demolding without damaging delicate details. Furthermore, silicone parts exhibit good durability, chemical resistance, and temperature tolerance.


Comparison: 3D Printing vs. CNC Milling for Mold Making

Aspect 3D Printing CNC Milling
Manufacturing Method Additive (builds layer by layer) Subtractive (removes material from a solid block)
Design Complexity High — easily handles complex and organic shapes Limited — best for simpler geometries or requires complex toolpaths
Surface Finish May need post-processing (sanding, coating) Smoother finish achievable directly
Material Options Primarily thermoplastics and resins Wider range including metal, wood, wax, plastic
Production Speed Faster for small and complex parts Faster for simple geometries and larger volumes
Tool Access Limitations None — can create enclosed/internal structures Yes — limited by tool angles and reach
Durability of Mold Depends on material (resin prints may be brittle) Typically stronger, especially in hard materials
Cost Lower for prototypes or one-off parts Higher setup cost but efficient for repeated use

Group 4

Sandra Hipatia Nuñez Torres

Manuel Ignacio Ayala Chauvin


Group Assignment – Molding and Casting

Group Members:

Objective: Apply molding and casting techniques using plaster, silicone rubber, and epoxy resin. Explore mold manufacturing methods and compare CNC machining vs. 3D printing.

We started the week by diving into the technical and safety data sheets of the three main materials we would use: plaster, silicone rubber, and epoxy resin. It was fascinating to discover how each one behaves differently in terms of mixing, curing, and safety.

We reviewed the safety and technical data sheets for plaster, silicone rubber, and epoxy resin. Each one had unique properties for mixing, curing, and handling. We also made comparison casts to analyze their behavior and results.

During our group work, we analyzed three essential materials used in molding and casting:

  • Plaster (Yeso)
  • Silicone Rubber
  • Epoxy Resin

We examined the technical data sheets of each material, focusing on physical properties, mixing and curing times, and safety guidelines.

Plaster

Composition: Calcium sulfate hemihydrate (CaSO₄·½H₂O).

Mix ratio: 80% plaster and 20% water, mixed until smooth and lump-free.

Drying time: Ideally 8 days, though we used it after 4 days due to time constraints.

Plaster Data Sheet

Silicone Rubber

Properties: Flexible, tear-resistant, excellent for capturing detail.

Curing time: 7 hours for solidification, 12 hours for complete drying.

Silicone Rubber Data Sheet

Epoxy Resin

Use: Applied inside silicone molds for final casting.

Working time: 20 hours to solidify, 72 hours for full cure.

Epoxy Resin Data Sheet

1. Preparation of Plaster Blocks

We started by preparing the plaster blocks with an 80/20 ratio of plaster to water. The mix was stirred until homogeneous, free of clumps or dry particles. We poured it into plastic molds and allowed it to dry.

Pouring plaster into molds
Figure 1. Pouring the plaster mix into molds manually. The fluid consistency is ideal for even filling.

The recommended drying time is 8 days; however, we accelerated the process to 4 days due to time constraints, which required extra care during handling.

Plaster blocks ready for machining
Figure 2. Solidified plaster blocks, ready for machining. Smooth texture and no air bubbles.

2. Machining of Custom Designs

Each team member selected a personal design:

Elephant CNC machining
Figure 3. CNC milling of the elephant shape into plaster. Clean contours and detailed carving.
Support CNC machining
Figure 4. Machining of the support model. Sharp edges and recessed zones stand out.

3. Silicone Mold Creation

We poured silicone rubber over the machined models to create flexible molds. Technical data sheets indicated a solidification time of 7 hours and demolding readiness after 12 hours of curing.

Silicone mold pouring
Figure 5. Silicone rubber is carefully poured over the model to capture fine detail.
Finished silicone molds
Figure 6. Final silicone molds for the elephant and support – reusable and durable.

4. Resin Casting

We cast epoxy resin into the silicone molds. The resin has a 20-hour solidification period and requires a full 72 hours to cure completely.

Epoxy resin casting Epoxy resin casting
Figure 7. Epoxy resin being poured into the prepared silicone mold with precision.

5. Results

The final products were:

Epoxy resin casting Epoxy resin casting

6. Comparison: 3D Printing vs. CNC Machining

Aspect 3D Printing CNC Machining (used)
Detail Precision Very High High (tool-limited)
Production Time Slow (depending on model) Moderate
Material Cost High (filaments) Low (plaster)
Mold Reusability Limited High with silicone molds
Versatility High (complex forms) Medium (simple geometries)

Conclusion

This technical analysis was key for selecting and applying the materials properly. Reviewing the data sheets ensured that the molding and casting process during Week 13 was both safe and efficient, allowing us to produce functional and well-formed pieces.

This group project allowed us to explore and understand the complete workflow of molding and casting, from material preparation to final product fabrication. Through hands-on experimentation with plaster, silicone rubber, and epoxy resin, we gained valuable insights into the properties, behavior, and handling requirements of each material.

By dividing responsibilities and working collaboratively, we not only produced two functional and detailed resin pieces—a figurative elephant and a structural support—but also reinforced our ability to manage timelines, follow technical datasheets, and adapt when faced with time constraints.

The comparison between CNC machining and 3D printing as mold fabrication methods also enriched our understanding of digital fabrication strategies, allowing us to weigh the pros and cons of each depending on the design and production context.

|