In the past, I have worked with ornamental plant pests, which are among the most heavily sprayed in agriculture. This intensive pesticide use often leads to the development of pest-resistant insect populations.
As a result, there is a clear need for improved pest monitoring methods. While similar products already exist on the market, the novel feature in this case is the ability to automatically change sticky cards. Whether this innovation is compelling enough from a user perspective remains to be seen. There is also a trade-off between the long-term reliability of such a mechanism and its overall user-friendliness.
To evaluate the potential adoption of the device, I would likely consult with potential users—such as greenhouse owners, grower associations, and similar stakeholders—not only to assess interest but also to guide improvements in the design.
Another important consideration is algorithm training, which remains undeveloped. Training with real insect data could be time-consuming and would require a large dataset of images. Furthermore, the optical system has yet to be tested. It is still uncertain whether the chosen camera will be capable of effectively focusing on actual greenhouse insects, given their small size. So some thought needs to go into the economic and technical feasibiliy for accomplishing these tasks.
I also found it fascinating to explore the wide range of intellectual property (IP) options available, which vary not only in form but also by country. At this stage, I am uncertain which IP route to pursue. This decision will depend on the level of interest in the device and its potential market. Depending on these factors, I would either apply for a patent or, if the goal shifts toward open development, opt for a Creative Commons license.