Assignment: 1) Scan an object (optional: print it) and 2) design and print an object that couldn't be done subtractively
The first scan I made was by using the 123D Catch app for iPhone and iPad. I chose a natural pearl because it has a very subtle irregular oval shape that would be hard to model. The first attempt I did, i quickly found out that I needed to get way more up close and personal with my object. I had captured an entire table, and my pearl was so tiny that it was really pixely and not at all hi-res.
Second attempt: I got closer, but my iPhone was unable to focus properly and after 6 pics I figured I kept getting really blurry pictures.
Third attempt! I put my pearl in the photo booth and borrowed Casper's Olloclip x10 macro lens for iPhone to capture the images. TRAGIC fail....Shirley suggested a white background, which worked for her. Let's try it.
Fourth attempt! Taking pics on a white backdrop in the photobooth. Focusing was a lot easier now for some reason, perhaps because the relative difference between yellow pearl and white background is smaller than (so less overcompensation on the automatic white balance). Wow gigantic fail again! My pearl looks like a shell now, or a boob...Well by the looks of current prosthetic boobs and bras getting a good model for that is hard enough nowadays, maybe there's money in my pearl boob, haha. Almost the same but not really. I'm starting to think it's the reflective quality of the pearl that's giving problems because the other students are getting their scans in with much less problems.
I'm not giving up on the pearl but I need to try something else now. To rule out my failures are caused by the shiny surface. So I did my bird machines. Now this is more like a 3D scan. It's just upside down...and missing some of the cutout details and it's funny about the surface it's standing on.
After Shirley's object took hours and hours I decided let's go for quick and dirty. Compared to a walnut my object is not only very small but also less complex in terms of curves.
These were my settings, I was done in 10 minutes. Well I would never have been able to model this in 10 mins with the skills I have today. About the scan pitch: 0.6mm compared to 0.2mm for a walnut is quite a big one but it worked well enough for practice).
I glued the pearl on with some hotglue. And filmed it. Because this is like machine porn. Wow :D
Oh yes and of course some pictures of the results
I modeled up some ideas in Rhino, one thing is a pendant that reminds me of an ivory thing my grandma had from Ceylon. I haven't been super thoughtful about the design because I also just had to practice. But I tried to keep it small.
I uploaded my first design, a ball with three smaller balls inside and various holes cutout to shapeways because I know it has some handy tools to tell you whether your model can be printed and if so with which materials. If there's problems with it, eg. with wall thickness and space between objects. It will point out the problem areas too and help you fix them, in some cases. Really handy. My model shows problems for some materials, but not for others.
Shapeways can fix some stuff that you can then download as X3D file, but Rhino doesn't open that. But with this knowledge I can also go back into my design and try to fix the wall thickness of the inside balls (min 1mm), and the proximity of the inside balls. I kept having open edges showing up all the time. And I guess the space (1.8cm or so) was a bit small for three balls that have thick enough walls and enough space between them. So I replaced them for one inside ball, problem solved.
I kept having problems with my upload to shapeways because of problems with the scale. It kept saying my file was 468 metres(!) long. After some searching I saw than a small object had flewn off into 3D space. My design passed the shapeways check so I'm happy to try printing it at de Waag and on Monday at HvA where they have a printer that can print support that is dissolvable with acid. Who knows, if it looks good maybe I'll treat myself to a brass version.
Fablab Amsterdam has Ultimaker original as weapon of choice. I printed my ball (with no ball inside) using Cura. I deleted the inside ball because these printers can't create support that can be dissolved. I'll keep that for later. Above you can see attempt 1 (on the left) and the second attempt (on the right).
These were the settings I used for the second one
Filament
> then hit PRINT! And wait til done
> to kill a job: click cancel print... then quickly go to JOG and double click Z to move the nozzle away from your object.
> remove filament while nozzle is still hot!
--------------------------------------------
At the university where I teach, we have a make space with a uPrint Dimension. The software of choice they use is CatalystEX, also by Dimension. The workflow is relatively easy and very comparable to Cura. You check the sizing, orientation and some settings and you send it to the printer. One benefit this printer has is that it prints special support material that you can wash away afterwards, which will allow me to print my ball inside the ball. It calculates all this itsef.
My print job took about 1.5 hours (the printer is very accurate, but not very fast. And it generates a lot of waste in terms of support material I guess. Nice for some projects but not really quick and dirty or adjustable. After printing I removed the support material by washing it out in a WaveWash machine with biodegradable citric acids (and other stuff). I washed it for 3.5 hours on the short cycle, half full progam.
It looks supernice! Really tight print, some strings there as well, but nothing i can't tweezer away.
The next day I went to the chemistry lab at my university to get some aceton rub going. I wasn't really impressed with the results of rubbing with aceton, so looked it up and only then I saw that you're supposed to polish it with the vapor of aceton. Like in this DIY tutorial.
The prac assistant offer to help me again with that so I went back a week later. It was done in a jiffy! Just a simple boiling plate, piece of wire and an erlenmeyer, oh yes and a professional chemistry suction system for the toxic fumes....:). I first tested with a failed print (miniature version of me) to play hangman in the bottle:
The aceton vaporizes around 60 degrees, you bring it to the boil first, then lower your piece (we put a rubber band around the bottleneck to secure its suspension), cover it with a top glass, wait for 10-20: when it gets glossy its done. Take it out before it starts drooping, then it's dissolving too much. Hold it up to dry, don't touch it, you'll make marks. The ball inside got glued to the wall, I could wiggle it loose afterwards, but it leaves some traces. Anyhow: wonderful results!
.STL file of the ball in ball design.
And the scan of the pearl (STL)
Rather than cleaning and printing my pearl. I will look into autodesk's app Memento: an app that allows you to scan objects and clean the meshes to make them fit for printing. I will try another object at home and see how far I can get with a print
First problem! This is only for Windows, luckily I could get my hands on a machine. Then found the setup got stuck because it can't find a licence agreement for Dutch (same problem goes for German users). Solution here though! Make small change in the AdskLicence.ini file (change Dutch.rtf to English.rtf.
Ah time was up this week before I continued this track. I spent some time working on the mechanical movement studies and made the second version of the handcrank cam wave instead.