Roland SRM20 Milling Machine

For this week’s group assignment, we used the Roland SRM20 Milling Machine.

Roland SRM20

How does a milling machine works ?

We call “milling” the process of removing material by advancing a cutter into a workpiece. The machine can apply this process thanks to rottary cutters. Depending on the machine, you can mill metal, wood or any solid material.

Roland SRM20

On the Roland SRM20, this process is automated but you can change the default parameters and vary the mill direction on one or several axes. You can also modify the cutter head speed and pressure.

Tool heads

The milling machine can be outfitted with various tool heads. Thoses tools can be changed to accomplish different machining needs.

The basic tooling bit on a milling machine is called the cutter. This cutter is a shaped bar that rotates rapidly to cut down and/or shape materials. In the following picture, you can see the straight shaped cutter and the V shaped cutter (25°).

Roland SRM20

It is attached to an arbor, which is sometimes called mandril or mandrel, that holds the cutter firmly.

Roland SRM20

What are we testing ?

Last year, our fabacademy comrades tested : * Two different speeds (4 mm/s et 3 mm/s) * Three different sizes of cutters

Roland SRM20

This year, we’re testing : * V cutter (25°) - Speed = 4 mm/s et 3 mm/s - 9000 rpm * Straight cutter 0.2 mm - Speed = 4 mm/s et 3 mm/s - 7000 rpm * Straight cutter 0.2 mm - Speed = 4 mm/s et 3 mm/s - 5600 rpm

Roland SRM20

Roland SRM20

Bonus test : * Chemical process ferric chloride

Roland SRM20

The process of milling a PCB

Roland SRM20

Roland SRM20

Roland SRM20

Roland SRM20

Roland SRM20

Roland SRM20

Roland SRM20

Roland SRM20

Results

We’ve had the best results with the V-shaped cutter at a speed of 3 mm/s. The bad results we had with the straight cutter were surprising to us. At first we thought the rotation speed of the cutter was too high, so we lowered the speed from 9000 rpm to 7000 and finally even to 5600, but that last one broke the tip.

Another explanation might be the quality of the substrate we used. Here we used FR1. We’ll try FR4 next time.